No Result
View All Result
Wednesday, March 18, 2026
Patriot TV Defenders Members
Patriot TV
  • Home
    • About
  • Posts
  • Home
    • About
  • Posts
No Result
View All Result
PatriotTV
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinions
Jerome Powell Fed Hard Hat

Jerome Powell Should Be Fired and Not Just Over Interest Rates

by Discern Reporter
July 27, 2025

In the summer of 1988, Democratic presidential candidate Mike Dukakis held a lead over George H.W. Bush, but that advantage evaporated quickly. A photo opportunity where Dukakis posed in a military tank, complete with an awkwardly fitting helmet, backfired spectacularly when Republicans turned it into a devastating ad campaign. The imagery portrayed him as an out-of-touch intellectual pretending to be tough, ultimately costing him the election—and many agreed it was a fair assessment for someone unfit for the presidency.

A similar awkward moment unfolded on July 24, 2025, when President Trump and Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell toured the Fed’s under-construction headquarters—a lavish $2.5 billion project dubbed a “Taj Mahal.” Both men wore hard hats, but while Trump, a seasoned real estate developer, appeared at ease and dominant in stature, Powell seemed uncomfortable and out of place, like an economist thrust into an alien environment. Trump highlighted the project’s notorious cost overruns during the visit, though Powell corrected him on the exact figure, noting it wasn’t quite as inflated as claimed—yet still excessively high.

Trump’s primary motivation for wanting Powell removed stems from the Fed chair’s reluctance to cut interest rates and stimulate economic growth. However, the construction-site episode, orchestrated by Trump to underscore Powell’s unease, served as a fitting symbol—much like Dukakis’ tank mishap—suggesting broader reasons why Powell might need to step down sooner rather than later. While the event could be dismissed as typical Trump theatrics, where he excels at commanding attention and Powell struggles even with core responsibilities like rate-setting, it highlights deeper issues.

The Importance of Fed Autonomy

It’s not a position taken lightly: Calls to oust Powell risk undermining the Federal Reserve’s independence, a cornerstone principle enshrined in the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. This autonomy ensures the central bank isn’t swayed by political pressures, such as presidential demands for rate cuts to boost the economy artificially. Without it, investors might view U.S. debt as vulnerable to inflation, leading to a refusal to buy bonds and triggering a financial catastrophe far worse than the 2008 crisis. Global confidence in U.S. debt underpins the nation’s standard of living.

Moreover, prematurely slashing interest rates could be ill-advised, especially amid potential inflation from Trump’s proposed tariffs. Yet, justifying Powell’s tenure based on preserving independence is challenging given his track record. Appointed by Trump in 2017 during his first term, Powell clashed with the president over demands for lower rates amid a booming economy fueled by tax cuts. Initially resistant—correctly, as the economy was overheating—Powell eventually yielded and implemented significant rate reductions.

This capitulation forms the first major critique: Powell demonstrated a lack of true independence. Those pre-COVID cuts depleted the Fed’s toolkit, leaving fewer options for injecting liquidity during the pandemic lockdowns.

Persistent Money Printing and Inflation Mismanagement

The second key issue arose during the COVID-19 crisis, when Powell deployed every available measure to flood the economy with money, essentially printing it prolifically. Even after restrictions lifted and the pandemic subsided, he continued this aggressive approach, maintaining near-zero interest rates well into the Biden administration. (Powell was reappointed by President Biden to a term ending in 2026.)

This persisted as Biden’s policies racked up trillions in spending, ballooning national debt and priming the pump for inflation. Powell, in coordination with Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, downplayed the risks, labeling the emerging inflation as “transitory.”

Far from temporary, inflation surged to 9.1%, marking one of the gravest errors in Fed history. Only then did Powell hike rates aggressively. Combating inflation is central to the Fed’s mandate, and its unchecked rise acts as a regressive tax, disproportionately burdening working-class families unable to hedge through investments.

Admittedly, endorsing Trump’s desire to replace Powell aligns with the president’s goals but for different rationales. Tariffs might drive up prices, and premature rate cuts could exacerbate inflation further. Removing Powell before his term concludes could spark a major constitutional showdown. Nonetheless, Powell’s pattern of policy missteps—from yielding to political pressure to mishandling inflation—and even his awkward presence at the headquarters tour make a compelling case for change. His departure, sooner rather than later, could benefit the institution.

Donation

Buy author a coffee

Donate

Comments 4

  1. Jim S says:
    8 months ago

    Based on current rampant inflation the rates should be around 7-8% In general for proper working of economy rates should never below 5%

    Reply
    • The Prisoner says:
      8 months ago

      That is nonsense, and you know it, inflation is not “rampant”. Inflation is down. Go read more junk textbooks.

      Reply
  2. IrishinTX says:
    8 months ago

    Since the Federal Reserve is not a government entity, why did Congress approved a cost plus renovation contract? Congress is who should be fired. The waste, fraud and abuse in Washington DC is alive and well as Ukraine sucks the taxpayer dry through a proxy war against Russia whereby the Defense Minister for Ukraine is an American that started the bombings into Russia. Yet, no one is screaming that our government is involved in an undeclared wars and unconstitutionally spending US taxpayer money. War is the number one cause of inflation. Full stop!

    Interest rates in the 1980’s was 13% for a mortgage and no one complained in order to cash flow the banks due to the housing down turn. Interest rates in the 1990 was 7.5% for a mortgage due to the dot com bust and Russia financial collapse. Again no one complained and homes still sold. A rate of 6.25% is not causing people not to buy, it is the ridiculous selling prices that no one can afford.

    A 4% to 5% interest rate causes people to save. No savings, no liquidity to the banks. In fact the rate is really too low, hence the Fed lowered the liquidity standards of banks. Go look at Weiss to see liquidity and profit are the weakest points in most banks.

    The real trap is Stablecoin run by private corporate entities that must use the money you turn over to buy treasuries, because the foreign market is drying up due to tariffs and wars thus they are selling our treasuries or backing off from buying them. Countries do not want to fund the US if we are going to start bombing them or their allies. So what do the Stablecoin buyers get? All the risk, because Stablecoin is not FDIC insured. Stablecoin buyers will also get tracked, traced and shut off on anybody’s whim. Those selling Stablecoin need to make a profit, but if you lower the interest rate then they make no money and will go poof into thin air with your money while you are left holding a worthless electronic zero or one.

    Powell didn’t shove all the cash into the economy during Covid, the Covidians in Congress started the printing press and tons of that money vanished, was stolen by non-existent companies and mass forgiveness for corporations that kept their employees. The people on the street are waiting, still waiting and left with a letter that the IRS acknowledges that these people did not receive a check. I have one of those letters where the IRS claims I am still owed $700 even though we put in for the $1,200 and they provided no explanation for the reduction. The IRS did the same thing to my brother and then had the nerve to tell us we were not entitled to a tax payer advocate.

    In the mean time, this administration is still pushing forward with fake meat, and has done nothing to stop the spraying of chemicals on the people. Now the CBO is saying social security checks can be cut by $18,100 annually in just 7 years, so by all means cut the interest rate on the elderly savers so they become homeless in 7 years.

    Reply
  3. jack says:
    8 months ago

    Mismanagement? Really? The Federal Reserve was passed in the dead of the night and created on a secret island. It is NOT Federal nor are there Reserves. It’s a private group of bankers. They lend out ONE dollar NINE times collecting interest on all NINE. They know exactly what they are doing.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to The Prisoner Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • About
  • Politics
  • Conspiracy
  • Culture
  • Financial
  • Geopolitics
  • Faith
  • Survival
© 2026 Patriot TV.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • About
  • Posts

© 2026 Patriot TV.