Special counsel Jack Smith went after Senator Ted Cruz’s phone records during his probe into the 2020 election challenges, zeroing in on a narrow window from January 4 to 7, 2021. That period covered the lead-up to the January 6 protests, when Cruz and others raised valid questions about electoral integrity. Yet AT&T refused to hand over the data, so those records never made it into Smith’s January 6 case file.
Why Cruz? He wasn’t the most outspoken voice calling for deeper analysis of the 2020 stolen election. And while he questioned the results, there were other Senators and members of Congress who would seem to be bigger targets.
Cruz is the ninth Republican senator caught in the DOJ’s net under the Biden administration. Others included Marsha Blackburn, Ron Johnson, Bill Hagerty, Josh Hawley, Cynthia Lummis, Lindsey Graham, Dan Sullivan, and Tommy Tuberville, plus Representative Mike Kelly. The subpoenas demanded everything: names, addresses, call logs, texts, voicemails—the works. But for some reason, Cruz was singled out for special focus.
“Arctic Frost was the Biden administration’s 21st-century digital Watergate,” Cruz told Axios. “They weaponized the DOJ and FBI to try to access records on me, President Trump, and other political opponents of the Democrat Party.”
He added, “It was intentional, targeted political spying that likely went to the very highest levels of the administration — demonstrating utter contempt for the Constitution and separation of powers — and there should be the broadest possible investigations and accountability.”
The code name “Arctic Frost” refers to the FBI’s sweeping operation that underpinned Smith’s election interference case against Trump. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley has been digging into this, revealing how the Biden FBI spied on eight Republican senators as part of it. Grassley’s oversight uncovered hundreds of subpoenas and dozens of interviews, all aimed at conservatives who dared to question the 2020 outcome.
Why Cruz in particular? He led the charge in the Senate to object to Arizona’s electors, citing widespread concerns over fraud and procedural flaws, but he was only mildly involved in the “Stop the Steal” movement outside of mild legal maneuvers. Was Smith trying to silence a key defender of election security in general, or was Cruz onto something with the angles he took?
Look at the pattern: Smith’s aggressive tactics now face backlash as the tables turn. House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan demanded Smith testify, grilling him on how many other members of Congress got swept up in Arctic Frost. Republicans like Senator Marsha Blackburn are calling for Smith’s law license to be investigated, accusing him of improperly targeting lawmakers.
It’s telling that President Trump’s political adversaries are now in the crosshairs—John Bolton just got indicted for mishandling classified documents, with the DOJ alleging he shared top-secret info via personal accounts. Letitia James, who hounded Trump with civil suits, faces federal bank fraud charges over a shady property deal in Virginia. Even James Comey stands indicted for false statements, tied to his anti-Trump antics at the FBI.
This isn’t a so-called “revenge tour” as leftists and legacy media are painting it. The Trump administration has the Deep State in its crosshairs, an apparatus that protects its own while punishing dissenters. Smith’s subpoena of Cruz smells like an attempt to intimidate those fighting for transparent elections, perhaps coordinated from the top to kneecap Republican leaders before they could expose more.
With Grassley demanding telecom companies cough up all records provided to Smith, and the FBI firing agents who worked on the probe, the full scope of this surveillance scandal could blow wide open. Accountability can’t come soon enough.
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.