(Daily Signal)—Is America heading into a “golden age” in President Donald Trump’s second term?
That was the question put up for discussion Thursday in a Munk Debate hosted by the Aurea Foundation in Toronto. The Munk Debates have been hosted semi-annually since 2008 and feature civil discourse by the “brightest thinkers of our time.”
On one side was Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts and Kellyanne Conway, who acted as a special counsel to Trump in his first term as president. On the other was New York Times columnist Ezra Klein and former senior adviser to President Barack Obama Ben Rhodes.
The debate was moderated by Canadian author Rudyard Griffiths.
“I think we have to acknowledge, whatever our views are, that the first 100 days and counting of his presidency have been some of the most consequential in American history since” President Franklin Roosevelt, Griffiths said to start the discussion.
He said that sweeping changes have been happening both nationally in the United States and globally as a result of Trump’s second term in office.
Roberts, who is the author of the book, “Dawn’s Early Light: Taking Back Washington to Save America,” began his remarks by saying that the last four years under President Joe Biden were a “dark age” in American life.
“It was a time when the government opened our southern border to chaos, but also a time when that same government shut the doors of our schools and churches,” Roberts said in his opening statement. “It was a time when bureaucrats told our children that bigots are people that somehow believe boys are boys and girls are girls as opposed to understanding biology.”
Roberts described an America in which “elites” in Washington thought they knew all the answers to the country’s problems as they ignored everyday people. This attitude was rejected, Roberts said, which is in part why America is at the dawn of a new golden age.
Trump’s election has already brought reforms to the American government that have not only been a massive reversal of how things were done before in Washington, but are already proving popular, Roberts said. He pointed to a recent poll by Rasmussen Reports showing that more people think America is on the “right track” than at any time in the 20-year history of the poll question.
In closing his remarks, Roberts joked that he was inviting the Toronto audience to join the United States as the 51st state.
President of the @Heritage Foundation @KevinRobertsTX jokes about Canada becoming America’s 51st state and is met with boos at tonight’s @munkdebate, taking place in Toronto, Canada ? pic.twitter.com/oLeGy1sl5W
— The Daily Signal (@DailySignal) May 29, 2025
Klein, the New York Times columnist, pointed to what he said were the ways in which Trump and his supporters are wrong.
“They are filled with contempt for the systems that undergird the world we’ve built,” Klein said. “It’s not just that they don’t know how they work, it’s that they don’t see the parts that are working.”
What this means is that Trump and his administration are putting the things that are working at risk, he said, while pointing to how the American economy has grown dramatically since the 1990s.
“In 1990 America accounted for about two-fifths of the overall GDP of the G-7 countries, today we are about half,” Klien said.
The G-7 countries are Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
Klein noted that per person GDP in the U.S. is about 40% higher than in Europe and 60% higher than in Japan. This has happened while China’s GDP has been slipping, he continued.
Klein, who recently authored the book, “Abundance,” said that to break the global system that America built and profited from “doesn’t serve America’s interests, is not going to bring us a golden age.”
Conway, who not only advised Trump but is a pollster as well, said in her opening remarks that America is “not just rebounding, it is roaring back with confidence and clarity.” She pointed to polls which showed that “nearly three-quarters of the country” believe the United States was on the wrong track and said that it was clear that the country responded to a presidential candidate who promised a new golden age in the 2024 election.
The result was that Trump won the “popular vote” as well as all seven swing states, she said. This came with a huge upsurge in a diverse set of voters who used to be a part of the Obama coalition and “massive swings among non-college educated households.”
Rhodes, who is also the co-host of the podcast “Pod Save the World,” asked rhetorically in his opening remarks, “If this is a new golden age, why do you have to compel institutions to be a part of it?”
The former Obama adviser said he agreed with his debate opponents that the border needed to be secured, “but this system is being run on terror.”
He said that “75% of people being sent to a brutal prison in El Salvador have no criminal record” and that many came to America “legally” according to the libertarian Cato Institute.
“A society that runs on fear is not going through a golden age,” Rhodes said. He pointed to tariffs as an impediment to American growth and said that countries will look elsewhere for trade, “most likely to China.”
Rhodes said that the Trump golden age is for “the Trump family, some very wealthy people, and maybe some people that are happy to see brown people deported and white South Africans taken into America as refugees.”
Roberts said in his first opportunity to respond that the Biden era was an age of “inversion” in which the federal government “reigned supreme,” and the people responded by saying they “want their country back.” And this was the case in poll after poll from Americans of every background, the Heritage president said.
He pointed to policies that have now begun to pick up steam, like “universal school choice,” which recently passed into law in Texas.
Klein said that Trump’s policies have already been bad and that the so-called Big, Beautiful Bill making its way through Congress was “the largest wealth transfer in history” from the poor to the rich. He said that things “aren’t going well now,” and that they will get worse when Trump’s policies really kick in.
Conway said that she had optimism about a new golden age like many of the American people and said that Rhodes mentioned in 2021 that he couldn’t wait for New York Attorney General Letitia James to put Trump’s children in jail.
“That’s not the language of optimism in the golden age,” she said. “But no worry, because the elite and the effete are being undermined.”
Rhodes responded that he can’t remember many of his social media posts and thought it was bizarre to consider a presidential election the start of a golden age since they happen every four years.
The moderator brought in a debate about tariffs and whether they could be a part of a golden age.
Roberts said, “What we prefer is a reciprocal tariff system that dishonors the great violators of free trade.”
Can America have a Golden Age without tariffs?@KevinRobertsTX, President of the @Heritage Foundation responds at tonight’s @munkdebate:
“What we prefer is a reciprocal tariff system that dishonors the great violators of free trade.” pic.twitter.com/zvhgbPwjWX
— The Daily Signal (@DailySignal) May 30, 2025
Klein said that Trump continually “borrows from the future,” and that tariffs are an example of that because the U.S. is using force and leverage against friendly countries less likely to do business in the future.
Rhodes spoke about tariffs and the issue of fentanyl.
“There is not a fentanyl problem on the northern border of the United States,” he said while comparing the amount of fentanyl that crossed the border to the size of a “backpack.”
It only takes 2 milligrams of fentanyl—the equivalent of four grains of salt—to kill you. 1 gram of could potentially kill 500 people.
Yet Ben Rhodes, host of Pod Save the World, says that “there is not a fentanyl problem on the nothern border of the United States,” during… pic.twitter.com/RDU5Dzp1yi
— The Daily Signal (@DailySignal) May 30, 2025
On the issue of national defense, the debate opponents found some common ground. Klein said that Trump was “right” that European nations don’t spend nearly enough on national defense.
WOW. @nytimes‘s Ezra Klein admits that “Donald Trump is right that Europe needs to spend more on defense.” ? pic.twitter.com/7Ac5ltfWnY
— The Daily Signal (@DailySignal) May 30, 2025
He said that if Trump calling out European nations to do more on defense got them to act with a little more “vigor” again, that would be good for Europe and possibly the U.S.
Roberts said that Trump is upending the status quo, including on defense.
.@KevinRobertsTX: Trump’s Gold Age Means the ‘Upending of the Status Quo’
“ Last fiscal year, the United States spent 3.4% of its GDP on Defense Canada spent something under 1.4%. Your prime Minister, maybe because he wants to make the president happy, but I’m just an American.… pic.twitter.com/33YnYKBSi7
— The Daily Signal (@DailySignal) May 30, 2025
“Last fiscal year, the United States spent 3.4% of its GDP on defense. Canada spent something under 1.4%,” he said. “Your prime minister, maybe because he wants to make the president happy, but I’m just an American, I’m assuming maybe he means it as well. If we’re gonna pick on Trump, maybe we’ll pick on Mark Carney. He said Canada needs to get to 2%.”
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.