(DCNF)—Polling for races in Michigan and Wisconsin did not accurately reflect the actual election results due to open primaries and the willingness from the further-left candidates’ bases to be surveyed, pollsters said.
Surveys indicated that Democratic Michigan Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed and Democratic Wisconsin gubernatorial candidate Francesca Hong held double digit leads ahead of their primaries, although El-Sayed narrowly won his race and Hong lost. Pollsters stated it was difficult to properly conduct surveys in these states because of their open primaries, while supporters of further-left candidates are more enthusiastic and willing to participate in polls.
An Emerson College Polling/WLNS/WOODTV survey, a Mitchell Research & Communications poll and other polls indicated El-Sayed led Democratic Michigan Rep. Haley Stevens by over 20 points. El-Sayed only beat Stevens by one point, 48.5% to 47.5%.
In open primary elections, it is difficult to determine likely Democratic voters since Republicans and independents can vote in Democratic primaries. Eli McKown-Dawson, a senior elections analyst at Silver Bulletin, told the Daily Caller News Foundation it was difficult to poll in Michigan and Wisconsin because they hold open primaries, meaning voters do not register with a political party.
“The polls in Wisconsin and Michigan did miss in a big way. But primary polls in general are more prone to error than polls of general elections. For example, the average polling error in polls of presidential primaries historically is about 9 points. It’s even higher, easily in the double digits on average, in polls of House and Senate primaries. So, while the misses in Wisconsin and Michigan were large, they weren’t extreme outliers for a primary,” McKown-Dawson told the DCNF.
“That’s because primaries are just harder to poll than general elections. Increasingly, polls rely on weighting and other kinds of statistical modeling to produce their final samples,” McKown-Dawson continued. “But many of the variables pollsters use to benchmark their general election polls aren’t available for primaries. It’s especially difficult in Wisconsin and Michigan because both states hold open primaries, meaning voters don’t need to be registered with a particular party to participate in its primary.”
The polls in both races surveyed too many young people and voters who were enthusiastic about the election, who tend to vote for further-left candidates like El-Sayed and Hong.
“It also looks like polls of both races contained too many young voters, and too many voters who were very enthusiastic about the election. That can be a general problem with polls that are increasingly conducted online or via text, if they’re missing anyone, it’s often older voters. In both Wisconsin and Michigan, younger more enthusiastic voters were the exact coalition who were fired up about Hong and El-Sayed, respectively,” McKown-Dawson said.
Democratic pollster Adam Carlson, the founding partner of Zenith Research, also wrote in a post-mortem of the Michigan primary that El-Sayed’s base was more “fired up” and willing to be surveyed. However, enthusiasm before Election Day does not mean more votes at the ballot box.
“Now, in a state like Michigan that has open primaries, it’s notoriously very difficult to nail the electorate/gauge who is voting in each primary,” Carlson wrote. “There was a competitive Republican gubernatorial primary this time, but turnout was 65% higher on the Democratic side than on the Republican side … “El-Sayed’s supporters were more fired up and willing to take polls down the stretch, but more enthusiasm does not necessarily equal more votes.”
Carlson also argued his poll misrepresented seniors, voters with a household income less than $50,000 per year and Republicans who may have voted for Stevens to stop El-Sayed from winning. He suggested that pollsters in Michigan should “err on the side of an older electorate” and pay close attention to party identification and income.
Stevens won the older, non-college educated and lower-to-middle income electorate, while El-Sayed was most successful in counties with white, college educated and higher-income populations. The congresswoman ran as the moderate candidate, campaigning on reforming rather than abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement, implementing a public option over Medicare for All and expressing strong support for Israel.
El-Sayed received endorsements from the anti-establishment, including independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, Democratic New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cotez and Democratic Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer quietly endorsed Stevens and asked party donors to support her, according to The New York Times.
In Wisconsin, several surveys published by State Navigate, Marquette University and Public Policy Polling repeatedly showed Hong leading her opponent, Democratic Wisconsin gubernatorial nominee David Crowley, by over 20 points. Crowley defeated Hong by less than 1% in Tuesday’s election.
Pollster G. Elliot Morris wrote the average error of a Senate or gubernatorial primary is around 13 points. He explained that the polls misinterpreted the average age and ideology of most of the voters. State Navigate, which conducted polls in Wisconsin, described a much younger electorate than the ones that show up to an August primary.
“It looks like both of these processes failed to anticipate an older, more moderate primary electorate. Or, at the least, weighting to a slightly older benchmark would have improved performance,” Morris wrote for State Navigate.
Among voters with a known age, the primary electorate was about 52% to 53% seniors, while 2% to 3% were under 30, Morris said. The poll sample in July consisted of 36% senior and 17% were under 30.
The August survey was also a recontact survey, meaning it polled the same participants who responded in July. It appeared that Crowley gained momentum later in the election cycle, meaning the polls did not accurately reflect his base’s support.
In 2016 and 2024, polls misrepresented the types of Democrats and Republicans who turned out on Election Day, Morris wrote. Moderate Democrats and Republicans were more likely to refuse pollsters, and it appeared that Hong’s supporters were more willing to answer.
“The right reading of this is that primary polling is hard in ways that general-election polling is not. It is reassuring that most of the 20-point miss by the polls came from two problems that are either (1) fixable (weighting model) or (2) unavoidable in primaries (late movement), rather than, e.g., pervasive non-response by moderates,” Morris wrote. “The first problem is fixable with accurate voter-file targets (and bias is further reduced with some handy guesswork about ideology and income). The second is fixable by fielding later — and by everyone, poll-readers included, treating a primary poll as a snapshot with a very short shelf life.”
A Marquette Law School poll found that 34% of respondents were undecided on how they would vote in late July. It appeared that undecided voters wound up supporting Crowley at the last minute, which likely helped push him across the finish line.
McKown-Dawson told the DCNF that primary elections change rapidly, adding there were many undecided voters up until Election Day.
“In Wisconsin, for example, you had candidates drop out quite late, and the eventual winner got back into the race just a few weeks before Election Day. It can be hard for polls to pick up late-breaking movement like that, especially when many voters were undecided even in the final pre-election polls,” McKown-Dawson told the DCNF.
“Pod Save America” co-host Dan Pfeiffer explained on X why he believed undecided voters likely picked Crowley over Hong.
“Crowley and Evers made electability a central issue down the stretch, and Hong’s media tour, trying to explain her past tweets, amplified voters’ concerns about her ability to beat Tiffany,” Pfeiffer said. “Bernie and AOC not endorsing further raised questions.”
Hong called on Thanksgiving to be cancelled in a November 2020 X post, claiming Americans should stop “celebrating colonialism.” She said on Election Day that she would not cancel the holiday.
Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez did not campaign with Hong ahead of the primary.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
Starting the Day With a Scripture-Inspired Roast Helps Center Your Thoughts on Eternal Truths Amid Temporal Pressures
The world can seem chaotic, especially right after we wake up. Many believers start their mornings reaching for something familiar — a hot cup of coffee — yet end up settling for mediocre brews that do little more than deliver a caffeine jolt. The daily grind of life, with its endless distractions, news cycles, and responsibilities, can leave even the most faithful feeling spiritually parched alongside their physical fatigue. What if your morning ritual could do more than wake you up? What if it could ground you in truth, nourish your body with exceptional quality, and quietly advance a kingdom purpose at the same time?
That’s the promise — and the reality — behind Promised Grounds Coffee. This Christian-founded company doesn’t just roast beans; it approaches every step as an act of worship and discipleship. By selecting only the top 10% of specialty-grade beans, ethically sourced from dedicated farmers in Central and South America, and small-batch roasting them with reverence in Austin, Texas, Promised Grounds delivers what many describe as the best coffee available — never burnt, never bland, but rich with origin stories and layered flavors that honor God’s creation.
From the vibrant Psalm 27 Roast (a light, bright medium option) to the bold yet peaceful 2 Timothy 1:7 Decaf, each bag carries a Scripture verse that turns your daily pour into a gentle reminder of faith. And through their Ounce Per Ounce Promise, every ounce of coffee you enjoy provides an equal ounce of clean water to families in need via partnership with Filter of Hope — literally brewing hope for body and soul, one cup at a time.
The challenge for today’s Christians runs deeper than finding a decent cup. In an age of convenience-driven consumerism, it’s easy to support companies that dilute values or remain silent on matters of faith. Many believers want their everyday choices — from what they drink to how they spend — to reflect discipleship rather than just convenience. Promised Grounds solves this by weaving Christian excellence into the entire process: beans nurtured with prayerful stewardship by farming families, roasted as an offering rather than a commodity, and packaged with Bible verses to encourage a mindset of gratitude and purpose from the first sip. Reviewers consistently praise the smooth, rich profiles — whether enjoyed black in a drip maker, iced on a warm day, or shared in fellowship — noting how the quality stands toe-to-toe with premium secular brands while delivering something far more meaningful.
This integration of faith and flavor addresses a real need in Christian households and ministries. Busy parents, church leaders, and remote workers alike report that starting the day with a Scripture-inspired roast helps center their thoughts on eternal truths amid temporal pressures. The coffee’s exceptional character — bright citrus notes in lighter roasts or deep chocolate undertones in bolder ones — comes from meticulous selection and careful roasting that respects the bean’s natural gifts rather than masking them. It’s the kind of coffee that elevates a simple quiet time, fuels productive workdays, or sparks meaningful conversations when shared at Bible studies or outreach events. And because it’s ethically sourced with integrity, every purchase supports sustainable livelihoods for farmers who treat their crops like family harvests.
For those leading churches or small groups, the impact multiplies. Promised Grounds offers bundles and options perfect for hospitality ministries, turning ordinary coffee service into an opportunity to point people toward the living water of Christ. Imagine greeting visitors with a warm cup whose very bag carries God’s Word — a subtle yet powerful witness that aligns with the Great Commission. The company’s Texas roots and commitment to “brewing hope” resonate especially with believers who value American enterprise paired with global compassion.
Of course, quality alone isn’t enough if the experience feels out of reach. Promised Grounds keeps it accessible with practical perks like free shipping on orders over $40, sample sets for discovering favorites, and thoughtful add-ons such as faith-themed mugs. Whether you prefer whole beans for fresh grinding, grounds for convenience, or even bulk options for larger households and ministries, the result is consistently superior coffee that makes discipleship feel integrated rather than added on.
As you consider how to align even the smallest habits with your walk with God, Promised Grounds Coffee stands out as a refreshing solution. It tackles the dual problems of subpar daily sustenance and disconnected consumption by offering a product that genuinely excels in taste while advancing a mission of clean water, farmer dignity, and scriptural encouragement. Believers who make the switch often describe it as more than a beverage upgrade — it becomes part of their rhythm of gratitude, a daily invitation to remember that every good gift comes from above.
If you’re ready to transform your mornings (and perhaps your church gatherings) with coffee that honors both exceptional craftsmanship and Christian values, I encourage you to explore what Promised Grounds has to offer. One sip at a time, you’ll be nourishing your body, refreshing your spirit, and participating in something far greater — all while enjoying what truly is among the best coffee available.