(DCNF)—Sen. Markwayne Mullin is stepping in to direct America’s national security at a tumultuous time for the Trump administration.
President Donald Trump on Thursday confirmed he is giving Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem the boot, capping off mounting controversy for the beleaguered secretary that reached a fever pitch when immigration agents killed two Americans in Minneapolis and ended after she was subject to two days of bipartisan grilling in Congress. Mullin, the president revealed, would be taking her place by the end of the month.
While never a central figure on major immigration legislation, the Oklahoma Republican has amassed a hawkish record on border security during his time on Capitol Hill. Republicans and pro-enforcement activists have mostly hailed the president’s decision.
A number of Democrat senators have praised the upcoming DHS chief, with Vermont Sen. Peter Welch calling him “competent and honest” and Pennsylvania Sen. Jon Fetterman already declaring he will vote in favor of his nomination. The burgeoning bipartisan support could prove monumental at a time when opposition against immigration enforcement is at record highs, particularly among Democrats.
“He’s been a reliable vote and not infrequent co-sponsor for bills that strengthen our enforcement system, both at the border and in the interior of the United States,” Jeremy Beck, co-president of NumbersUSA, a Washington, D.C.,-based group that advocates for stricter immigration policies, told the Daily Caller News Foundation.
A spokesperson for Mullin did not respond to a request for comment from the DCNF.
‘Change Is Long Overdue’
Beck praised Mullin’s support of H.R. 2 during the last legislative session, a bill he argues would’ve stemmed illegal immigration when former President Joe Biden was overseeing an unprecedented border crisis.
“Our hope is that he continues to understand that Congress has a role to play here and beyond that, to continue to be diligent, to protect the enforcement agencies and the men and women who are in there,” the NumbersUSA chief continued. “And at the same time, re-establish some of the credibility with the public that’s taken a hit in recent months.”
Administration insiders aren’t complaining about Noem’s exit, either.
“The Department needed a leader who executed the president’s agenda, not their own,” a senior administration official told the DCNF, speaking under the condition of anonymity in order to talk freely about internal matters. “This leadership change is long overdue and brings real relief to a hell of a lot of people at DHS.”
“She [Noem] had it coming — and she blew every opportunity to correct course,” the official continued. “It wasn’t a question of if. It was only a matter of when.”
First elected to Congress in 2012, Mullin represented Oklahoma’s 2nd Congressional District for a decade before winning a special election in 2022 to replace the late GOP Sen. Jim Inhofe.
While serving as a congressman during the first Trump administration, Mullin openly supported the president’s use of the military to bolster border security and his effort to build a wall between the U.S. and Mexico.
The Republican quickly became an ardent critic of Biden’s immigration agenda.
“Joe Biden’s decision to end [Title 42]is reckless and unforgivable,” Mullin stated on X in April 2022, referring to a COVID-era policy introduced under Trump to cut down border activity. “Eliminating what little security measures we had in place without a plan will put American lives in jeopardy. Once Title 42 expires, Joe Biden will have even more blood on his hands.”
During the current legislative session, the Oklahoma senator voted to boost interior and border enforcement resources and voted to reduce amnesty entitlements, supporting the One Big Beautiful Bill and the Laken Riley Act. The Immigration Accountability Project, another group that advocates for tighter border enforcement, highlighted his recent cosponsorship of the SAVE America Act, ICE Protection Act and the SAVE Act.
Mullin’s enforcement record on Capitol Hill isn’t without some blemishes, with the NumbersUSA official scorecard faulting the lawmaker for not co-sponsoring legislation that would reduce chain migration, require employers to use E-Verify, or limit the importation of foreign workers. Other immigration hardliners are adopting a wait and see mentality and declined to comment.
The Oklahoma lawmaker defended the ICE agent who shot and killed Renee Good in early January, arguing that the Minneapolis agitator gave the agent no other option after she drove into him.
“At the same time, we don’t know what she has in that vehicle,” Mullin told News Nation after the incident. “We don’t know if she has weapons. We don’t know what the situation is, but she clearly pulled in front of the ICE agents to block their path.” The ICE agent involved ultimately suffered internal bleeding from being hit by Good’s vehicle.
Other border hawk groups embraced Mullin’s nomination, with the Federation for American Immigration Reform issuing a congratulations and the newly-formed Mass Deportation Coalition encouraging him to take a look at their soon-to-be released plan to remove one million illegal immigrants from the country.
‘Restoring Law And Order’
The president’s decision to nominate Mullin follows an incredibly turbulent two months for Noem.
The outgoing secretary’s problems began in earnest during Operation Metro Surge, a joint ICE and Border Patrol operation in Minneapolis where scuffles with anti-law enforcement agitators led to the deaths of Good and Alex Pretti in January. The killing of two Americans at the hands of immigration agents led to incredible public backlash and gave Democrats an opening to demand reforms for ICE agents, leaving key DHS agencies without pay as funding negotiations continue to stall.
Noem spoke before the Senate Judiciary Committee and the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday and Wednesday, respectively, where she faced tough questioning from both Democrats and Republicans. The DHS chief was not only asked about the handling of the Minneapolis operation, but was also grilled on an alleged affair between her and top advisor Corey Lewandowski, who is expected to exit DHS along with her.
What appeared to be the nail in the coffin for Noem was her claim to Congress that Trump personally approved a DHS advertisement campaign that cost $220 million in taxpayer funds. Trump publicly stated he did not approve of the ad buy and was reportedly enraged at Noem’s claim.
Lousiana GOP Sen. John Kennedy — who was notably among the Republican lawmakers who grilled Noem — later told reporters that Trump was “mad as a murder hornet” after Noem’s testimony.
While announcing the end of her tenure atop DHS, Trump added that Noem would be shifted to Special Envoy for The Shield of the Americas, a coalition of Latin American countries working together on policy initiatives to help secure the Western Hemisphere, according to the administration.
A member of the Cherokee Nation and a former mixed martial arts fighter before entering politics, Mullin is expected to begin leading DHS on March 31.
“President Trump ran on restoring law and order, and he quickly delivered the most secure U.S. border in American history,” Mullin said in a statement Thursday. “I look forward to supporting [Trump’s] mission to safeguard the American people and defend the homeland.”
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.