(DCNF)—SiriusXM’s Megyn Kelly fired back at legal guest Dave Aronberg Friday on her show after he tried to give Attorney General Pam Bondi the benefit of the doubt when it came to how she spoke about the “Epstein files” on live television.
The FBI and Department of Justice (DOJ) said they found no evidence that deceased pedophile Jeffrey Epstein maintained a “client list.” They also said he was not a victim of foul play when he died. Republicans have called out the administration’s lack of transparency on the remaining files and pushed back against Bondi. While discussing the issue on “The Megyn Kelly Show,” Aronberg told the host he would give Bondi the “benefit of the doubt” based on her previous interview with Fox’s Jesse Watters, noting she hadn’t said that the information being released would “blow your socks off in that interview.”
“I do think that if anything, that you can get caught up in the moment when you go on Fox News and they’re pushing you to say ‘Hey, what’s going on?’ And if you say it’s a nothingburger, yeah, it’s not a good interview. So perhaps that is a legitimate issue — ” Aronberg said before Kelly jumped in.
“But Dave, you tell me, you are a former state’s attorney. You know very well how the average, the normal, like literally every other attorney general would answer those questions,” Kelly said. “Number one, they would not be on television talking about the case. Number two, if for some reason they really felt compelled to go on television, you know exactly what they’d say. It’s an ongoing investigation, and I’m not at liberty to discuss it yet, period.”
On Feb. 26, Bondi appeared on Watters’ show to discuss when the long-awaited files from Epstein’s case would be released. With the public demanding transparency, Bondi said she had the “Epstein files” on her desk, adding the public would see “a lot of flight logs, a lot of names, [and] a lot, a lot of information” the following day.
After a briefing at the White House on Feb. 27, Bondi and the administration got major backlash when the public discovered that conservative influencers were given a binder labeled “Epstein Files: Phase 1” with the information placed under a brief embargo.
“Well, she’s breaking norms and going on TV, but so is her boss, right? She’s taking the cue from her boss, doing things that no one has ever done before,” Aronberg said before Kelly stopped him.
“The boss can do whatever the hell he wants! The president can always do whatever the hell he wants,” Kelly said. “The attorney general, the top law enforcement officer of the United States under every administration, Republican, Democrat, 99% of the time, keeps their mouth shut because they don’t want to get ahead of the facts.”
Some Republicans have called for Bondi’s resignation.
Epstein died in 2019.
Questions regarding Epstein’s death have circulated online. His brother Mark cast doubt on Epstein killing himself. He told the Miami Herald in 2019 that his brother “knew a lot of stuff about a lot of people.” Mark Epstein hired forensic pathologist Dr. Michael Baden, who told Fox News after his evaluation that Epstein’s autopsy appeared more consistent with homicidal strangulation than suicidal hanging.
The DOJ released over 10 hours of footage from outside Epstein’s cell to dispute speculation that he did not kill himself. Some have questioned a missing minute in the video. Bondi told reporters Tuesday it was the result of the Metropolitan Correctional Center resetting the cameras every night.
The FBI and DOJ said Epstein did not maintain a “client list.” Bondi, however, repeatedly said in interviews that there were “flight logs” and “names” among the files.
“They don’t want to get ahead of the investigation, and it’s really not appropriate to be commenting because this is what can happen. She turned herself into the Brian Williams of DOJs, where she just spewed a bunch of nonsense because she wanted attention, and now she’s been caught. That’s how it looks to me,” Kelly added.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.
She’s covering for someone or perhaps many someones. If she wasn’t, Bongino wouldn’t be ready to blow his career up.
Blondie needs to go. Surely there are others much more qualified for this job.
It could be that she over spoke what she should not have said, true or not. Now she is between a rock and a hard space. If what she has implicates anyone in the Trump administration, she would be required to do what she is now doing. It is not a good look. But, before we loose our cookies, lets give it a little time to see what fleshes out.
What I don’t get is how not a single person besides Epstein and Maxwell was involved in the established sex trafficking. Charge them and offer some of them immunity if necessary to get the truth. Unless we already know the truth and are protecting the sponsors and perpetrators from having it revealed. Isn’t it obvious that this must have been an intelligence op? Our government doesn’t want to know how low it can sink.
There is no evidence of any speculation about Epstein. He’s dead, and Maxwell won’t ever talk since they didn’t give her a deal. This is over, drop it and move on to deporting all the illegals, you know, something important.
It’s easy to complain and moan about something where there is zero evidence, you just speculate to your heart’s content. This unhealthy fascination with Epstein is really bad for people. It’s very, very likely that there is no evidence, because if there was, people would have been prosecuted years ago. The real bad guys here are the parents who let their underage girls hop on a private jet to a private island alone.
Is PB Jessie Smollett of the DOJ? I guess time will tell.
One thing for certain, she set-up an expectation with the American public, and whole world for that matter, when she said:
“Bondi was asked in a Fox News interview whether the department would release such a (client list) document.
She replied: “It’s sitting on my desk right now to review.”
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt and Justice Department spokesperson Chad Gilmartin said Monday that Bondi was referring to the Epstein files in general, not a client list specifically.
Among the evidence that the Justice Department says it has in its possession are more than 10,000 videos and images that officials said depicted child sex abuse material or “other pornography.” Bondi had earlier suggested that part of the reason for the delay in releasing additional Epstein materials was because the FBI needed to review “tens of thousands” of recordings that she said showed Epstein “with children or child porn.”1
Ref: (1) https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/epstein-client-list-doesnt-exist-doj-says-walking-back-theory-bondi-promoted
So, the average American knows that Gislain Maxwell is now in jail, for ‘no crimes’ because there were ‘no’ perpetrators highlighted in those videos.
Has it really come to this, nothing happened nothing to see here, move along? Really?
So we are to believe Epstein killed himself for committing no crime?
Pam Bondi passed off a ‘positively doctored’ jail tape as evidence of of what?
Is she the best they’ve got as AG?
Are we expected to accept the U S now jails people for no reason? Is that the lesson from this nothing burger?