No Result
View All Result
Wednesday, September 2, 2026
Patriot TV Defenders Members
Patriot TV
  • Home
    • About
  • Posts
  • Home
    • About
  • Posts
No Result
View All Result
PatriotTV
No Result
View All Result
Home Articles Curated
SCOTUS

Supreme Court’s ‘Vampire Rule’ Decision Has Breathed New Life Into Gun Litigation

by Harold Hutchison, Daily Caller News Foundation
July 18, 2026
Listen to "Patriot TV" on Spreaker.

DCNF(DCNF)—The Supreme Court’s decision in Wolford v. Lopez has led to legal fallout across the country, with one federal appeals court striking down New Jersey’s long-standing ban on modern semiautomatic firearms.

The high court ruled in Wolford v. Lopez that Hawaii’s law requiring private property owners who wished to allow concealed carry on the premises to clearly post signs that carrying guns, also known as the “vampire rule,” was allowed was unconstitutional. After that ruling, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit requested supplemental briefs in Cheeseman v. Platkin, a case challenging New Jersey’s ban on so-called “assault weapons” on Second Amendment grounds by July 10 to address the effects of Wolford.

On Friday, the Third Circuit shot down not just New Jersey’s ban on modern semi-automatic firearms, it also invalidated the state’s ban on detachable magazines holding more than ten rounds in an en banc ruling.

“Applying the framework announced in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, we agree with the District Court that New Jersey’s ban on Colt AR-15s violates the Second Amendment,” the court said in the opinion written by Circuit Judge Arianna Freeman, a Biden appointee. “However, because the record supports the same result for all semi-automatic rifles—not only Colt AR-15s—we will MODIFY the District Court’s order so that it deems the Assault Firearm Provisions unconstitutional with respect to the full class of semi-automatic rifles. We will AFFIRM that part of the order as modified.”

The Wolford decision didn’t just affect the New Jersey case. In a case from Texas, the Department of Justice asked the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to dismiss an appeal of a ruling that struck down a ban on carrying firearms in post offices Thursday.

“Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b), defendant-appellant hereby moves to voluntarily dismiss this appeal, with each party to bear its own costs,” the Thursday filing said. “Counsel for plaintiffs-appellees indicated that plaintiffs-appellees do not oppose this motion.”

Chief Judge Reed O’Connor of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, a George W. Bush nominee, issued a nationwide injunction on Sept. 30, 2025, blocking enforcement of a provision in federal law and a regulation as they pertained to carrying firearms.

The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) announced Tuesday it was filing supplemental briefs in three cases involving Second Amendment challenges to provisions of the National Firearms Act of 1934 that would cite the high court’s Wolford ruling.

Show Hours

“With those rulings in hand, we are now able to better explain to the courts exactly why the remaining registration scheme left in the NFA lacks constitutional authority and is a direct violation of Americans’ Second Amendment rights,” SAF Senior Director of Legal Operations Bill Sack said. “We are hopeful these cases will move expeditiously and rightfully restore the full constitutional rights of gun owners across the nation.”

The National Rifle Association and the Illinois State Rifle Association cited the Wolford decision when suing to toss out a 72-hour waiting period in Illinois.

The high court granted writs of certiorari in Viramontes v. Cook County, Illinois and Grant v. Higgins, cases involving bans on modern semiautomatic firearms imposed by Cook County, Illinois, and Connecticut, on June 30, five days after deciding the Wolford case.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

Donation

Buy author a coffee

Donate
At last, a conservative news aggregator that does not bow to the woke right.
Listen to "Patriot TV" on Spreaker.





Two Storms, One Harvest

Empty Shelves

Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.

What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.

Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.

This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.

Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.

Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.

The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running

While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.

The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.

Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.

The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.

Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.

The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?

The System Has No Slack Left

The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.

Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.

There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.

The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.

What Joseph Knew

Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.

Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.

Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.

Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.

None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.

Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.

  • About
  • Politics
  • Conspiracy
  • Culture
  • Financial
  • Geopolitics
  • Faith
  • Survival
© 2026 Patriot TV.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • About
  • Posts

© 2026 Patriot TV.