(The Epoch Times)—Amid a wave of student walkouts opposing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations, an Oklahoma school district has suspended more than 100 youths who protested during school hours, Gov. Kevin Stitt said.
The governor, writing on X on Feb. 18, commended Charles Bradley, superintendent of the Mustang Public Schools in Yukon, Oklahoma, “for suspending 122 students who walked out of class to protest.”
Stitt also issued a cautionary message, saying, “Young Oklahomans: Free speech is sacred, but truancy robs your future. Stay in school, build skills, and make your voice heard responsibly.”
The large-scale suspensions in Oklahoma follow walkouts of schoolchildren across the nation, sometimes erupting in vandalism and physical attacks, and risking student safety.
Districts are trying to balance those concerns with students’ free-speech rights as well as parental rights. They also must navigate liability concerns and school policies, as plans for additional protests take shape.
The Epoch Times contacted the Mustang Public School District for comment but received no reply prior to publication.
Meanwhile, plans for additional protests in at least three locations have been publicized.
A “countywide” walkout is set for Feb. 20 in Prince William County, Virginia, according to an Instagram post from organizers.
In Chicago, William Howard Taft High School also expects a walkout on Feb. 20. The school’s official X account states that “participation is optional.” The school said staff would supervise the protest and parents would be notified if their children join it.
In Richmond, Kentucky, some students plan to leave class for an ICE protest on Feb. 26, according to multiple Instagram posts.
The Mustang Public School District, located outside the state capital of Oklahoma City, previously made a public statement warning that high schoolers “who remained off campus beyond authorized times” during a Feb. 5 “unsanctioned demonstration” would face action under the district’s attendance policy and student conduct code.
“The content of their speech or their viewpoint” was irrelevant, the district said. Rather, students were being disciplined “for leaving class and missing instruction during the school day.”
In addition, the district said, “This activity was not school-sponsored or approved,” and as the walkout was in progress, staff and administrators immediately took steps to supervise the students and “prioritize campus safety.”
“Classroom instruction continued for students who remained, and the learning environment was maintained,” the district said.
The district encouraged parents to talk with students about “school expectations, the importance of remaining on campus during the instructional day, and making safe, responsible choices.”
In addition, the statement said, “Despite social media claims alleging adult involvement, district leadership reviewed all allegations and found no evidence that any Mustang Public Schools employee instigated, organized, or facilitated this student activity.”
In responses on X to the governor’s statement, a number of commenters said the suspensions seemed appropriate, while a few people raised concerns.
If parents approve of their children participating in the protest, that would not meet the student handbook’s definition of truancy, which was “absence without permission of parents or school,” one commenter said.
Anti-ICE protests gained momentum in January after two protesters, Renee Good and Alex Pretti, were each shot and killed in two separate confrontations with federal immigration officers who were attempting to arrest wanted persons.
During a Jan. 30 “National Shutdown,” dozens of organizations encouraged people to boycott work, school, and businesses to show their opposition to ICE. Organizers claimed success, trumpeting on their website, “50 states, 300 actions, 1000+ organizations, millions standing up.”
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.