(The Center Square)–Claims from current and former Minnesota state employees that have been vetted by state lawmakers allege their bosses ignored and rebuked fraud warnings for years, retaliated against the employees who raised the alarms and protected leaders who oversaw the fraud-laden programs, according to a whistleblowers’ letter obtained by The Center Square.
The claims are made in an unsigned letter to Congress as it investigates fraud schemes that bilked government assistance programs for hundreds of millions of dollars in the state.
Some employees claimed they were accused of racism, in part because the money was flowing to “diverse communities,” the letter said. Most of those who have been federally indicted for the fraud schemes are of Somali descent.
Minnesota state Rep. Kristin Robbins – a Republican who leads a state investigation into the fraud and has communicated with the letter’s authors –submitted the letter as part of her testimony to federal lawmakers this month. Its contents have not been previously reported.
Specifically, the letter focused on the state’s Housing Stabilization Services program, which awarded taxpayer dollars to organizations to ensure housing for older residents and those with disabilities, significant mental illness and substance-abuse disorders.
That program – initially estimated to cost less than $3 million each year when it launched in 2020 – swelled to about $104 million in 2024 and was on track to surpass that figure in 2025 before the program was shuttered, according to federal court records.
More than a dozen people have been indicted in recent months for fraud schemes related to the program.
Eric Grumdahl, an assistant commissioner for the Department of Human Services who oversaw the program, was fired in September, shortly before he was expected to testify before a state committee that is investigating the fraud.
The whistleblower group that penned the letter said concerns about the program – the first in the nation to offer Medicaid coverage for the housing services – culminated in late 2022, when state employees pressed Grumdahl to act.
“His response to staff was alarming,” the letter said. “Fraud concerns … were strongly dismissed and numerous employees experienced serious retaliation.”
State employees who aired their worries about fraud allege they were the subject of repeated internal investigations and surveillance, work reassignments and veiled threats about their employment.
“You will never get another state job,” one employee was allegedly told.
In January 2023, state workers took their concerns to top Department of Human Services leadership, human resources administrators and auditors, and later to the governor’s office.
The next month, the department’s then-leader, Jodi Harpstead, told hundreds of employees in an all-staff meeting “to stop reporting concerns that she did not feel were relevant,” the letter said.
Harpstead resigned in February 2025.
At the time, Gov. Tim Walz praised her job performance.
“I am proud of her work running the most complex and wide-ranging agency in state government,” he said.
Harpstead’s successor, interim Commissioner Shireen Gandhi, said the department has taken steps to “change the culture” to be more receptive to employee feedback.
“When employees feel heard and trusted, they are better positioned to surface risks early, improve systems, and deliver strong outcomes for Minnesotans,” she said in a statement her department provided to The Center Square.
The department did not directly respond to the contents of the whistleblowers’ letter.
In recent months, 13 people have been accused of federal crimes for fraud schemes related to the housing program. They submitted claims to the state for about $14 million worth of reimbursements, court records show.
The people are accused of drastically overstating the actual help they provided to people who need housing assistance and of using the public money instead for personal expenses, such as buying land in Kenya and investing in cryptocurrency.
“What we see are schemes stacked upon schemes, draining resources meant for those in need,” former U.S. Attorney Joseph Thompson said in September, when the first federal charges related to the Minnesota housing program were announced. “It feels never ending.”
Fraud investigations related to the housing program and other assistance programs in Minnesota are ongoing. They have identified about $300 million of fraud related to the former Feeding Our Future organization, which had claimed it provided meals to children. That government aid was overseen by the state Department of Education.
The whistleblower letter said Human Services employees reported their concerns about contract irregularities, fraud potential, lax oversight, unusual financial transactions, compliance failures, improper promotions and others, repeatedly between 2019 and 2025 about a variety of programs.
Jared Strong is an investigative reporter for The Center Square based in the Midwest. He is a lifelong Iowan who has worked for news organizations – big and small – for more than 20 years. He and his wife have three children, a small flock of chickens and an old Case tractor.
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.