(The Center Square)–Secretaries are well known for earning modest wages, but not the ones who work at Pocantico Hills Central School District. At the school district of 500 students outside New York City secretaries make $130,000 and $190,000 a year, an investigation by The Center Square found.
The highest paid is Gina L. Downes, a confidential secretary. Her salary is $110,538 this school year, and she will receive $79,281 in benefits and other payments. Downes, who will complete her 20th year on the job in the spring, has benefited from a civil service-based pay system, a common feature in the public sector.
Another secretary, Annabel Maya, will earn $73,659 plus $56,034 in benefits and overtime. Her tenure began four years ago. Downes and Maya were among the district’s well-compensated employees.
Daniel Linehan, a physical education teacher who started in the district in 1995, will earn a salary of $146,199 and almost $60,000 in other benefits this school year.
Michael Vanyo, assistant superintendent for business and operations, will make $240,507 and $53,511 in benefits. In a phone interview, Vanyo defended the pay packages.
“I have very few staff members, so those secretaries are doing multiple jobs, he said. “Plus, they tend to stay, because Pocantico Hills is a good place to work and live. I could pay them less, but we would have constant turnover.”
Pocantico Hills Central School District, in Westchester County, is not alone in the Empire State in compensating its employees generously. Another district is Shelter Island Union Free School District, a school district of roughly 190 students in Suffolk County.
Office assistant Donna Clark will earn $98,792 in salary, benefits, and other payments this school year, while her counterpart Meghan Lang will rack up $91,328, according to school district records. While Clark’s and Lang’s secretarial peers in Pocantico Hills earn more, Shelter Island pays its top administrators more.
The district’s superintendent, Dr. Brian Doelger, will take home an eye-popping $319,170 in salary, benefits, and other payments this school year. Director of Athletics Todd Gulluscio will receive a total pay package of $189,513. The school district did not respond to a request for comment.
A third school district that rewards employees with generous pay packages is Bridgehampton Union Free School District in Suffolk County, a region known popularly as the Hamptons.
Superintendent Mary T. Kelly will earn a total pay package of $246,291, while two district staff will make six figures. District clerk Tammy Cavanaugh made $44,318 in salary, benefits, and overtime from July 1 to Nov. 14, a figure that prorated comes out to $118,938 this school year. Brianna Covais, director for pupil personnel services, earned $59,423 in salary, a figure that prorated comes out to $159,480 this school year.
The three school districts’ per-pupil spending was among the highest in New York State’s K-12 public school system of 2.4 million students, according to state data. Pocantico Hills spent $71,439 per student, while Shelter Island spent $65,959 in the 2023-2024 school year. Both are on the high end of what private four-year colleges charge for tuition.
Bridgehampton spent $92,586 for each of its roughly 200 pupils in 2023-2024. The sum was more than the $90,012 that Pepperdine University, a private Christian school in Malibu, Calif., charged for on-campus tuition.
In a previous story, district staff attributed the high per-pupil costs to infrastructure spending spread over very few students, but additional data obtained by The Center square shows that salaries in those districts are also big budget items.
Zilvinas Silenas, president and CEO of The Empire Center for Public Policy, a non-profit, free-market oriented think tank, said high salaries help account for the districts’ high spending.
“The median pay for a teacher in Pocantico is $121,703, which is in the top 20 percent of school districts with the highest median pay,” he noted.
Vanyo, Pocantico Hills’ assistant superintendent, said the district spends more on other budgetary needs.
“It is a unique situation,” he said in an interview. “We are a K-8 school district and pay tuition for our high school students.”
Vanyo added that the district pays the costs of its high school students to attend one of three public schools in the area as well as the textbooks and healthcare of students who attend private high schools.
The typical school district in New York spent $35,095 per pupil in the 2023-2024 school year, according to the state’s Department of Education. The figure was the highest nationwide. By contrast, Utah spent roughly $10,000.
Despite New York’s high median figure, six school districts spent almost or more than $70,000 per student, double the average.
The top spending district was Fire Island Unified School District, a small island off the coast of Long Island. It reported spending $132,196 for each of its roughly 50 students, according to state data.
The second highest spending district was Bridgehampton Union Free School District in Suffolk County. It spent $92,586 for each of its roughly 200 pupils in 2023-2024.
Two more high-spending districts were in Suffolk County on eastern Long Island. Quogue Union Free School District spent $86,163 for each of its roughly 130 students, while Amagansett Union Free School District spent $78,916 for each of its roughly 120 pupils.
To get a better handle on the districts’ spending, last month The Center Square submitted requests under New York’s Freedom of Information Law for staff salaries at five school districts. What the districts’ responses show is generous staff pay is only one reason for high spending.
“It’s complex and multi-factorial,” Silvenas said in an interview, “To be fair to Pocantico Hills School District, there are roughly 100 school districts where median teacher pay is even higher.”
Consider Scarsdale Unified School District in Westchester County, a district of 4,700 students outside New York City. It pays its teachers $156,000 annually, the highest in the state. Yet Scarsdale spent $37,800 per pupil in 2023-204, a figure far below that of Pocantico Hills’ $71,439.
Silvenas acknowledged that transportation, building upkeep, and classroom materials are key reasons for high spending. Each of the six highest spending school districts in New York has fewer than 500 students, a barrier to economies of scale.
Dr. Mary T. Kelly, superintendent of Bridgehampton’s school district, said small districts like hers get no breaks from the state.
“Bridgehampton offers a full continuum of services — including Advanced Placement courses, a new Career and Technical Education program, athletics, performing arts, special education, and transportation across a large geographic area — all of which must be provided regardless of enrollment size,” she said in an interview.
While capital and transportation costs are important, teacher and staff salaries are, too.
Roxbury Central School District in upstate New York had roughly 230 students in the 2023-24 school year, a figure less than half that in Pocantico Hills and only 40 fewer than Shelter Island. Yet Roxbury spent less on annual teacher salaries—$60,517 per teacher, according to The Empire Center.
That was similar to the $59,449 and $57,673 annual salaries of Shelter Island’s two office assistants and tens of thousands less than Pocantico Hills’ two secretaries. Vanyo rejected the comparison between upstate and downstate school districts.
“We’re twenty-five miles outside New York City,” he said in an interview. “It’s an expensive place to live.”
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.