(All Israel News)—Finance Minister and Religious Zionism chairman Bezalel Smotrich voted against the proposal of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to have the IDF take control of the entire Gaza Stip, and later criticized Netanyahu, saying he has “lost faith” that the prime minister “can and wants to lead the IDF” to do so.
Smotrich strongly attacked Netanyahu’s proposal in a video statement uploaded to ?, saying it misleads both the Israeli public and the reservists, because it its goal is not a complete and final victory over Hamas, rather it is only intended to increase pressure on Hamas to reach a hostage-ceasefire deal.
לצערי בישיבת הקבינט האחרונה איבדתי את האמון שראש הממשלה יכול ורוצה להוביל את צה”ל להכרעה וניצחון. pic.twitter.com/tyvHKThf5o
— בצלאל סמוטריץ’ (@bezalelsm) August 9, 2025
“I have lost faith that the prime minister can and wants to lead the IDF there,” Smotrich said following the Cabinet decision.
Despite the prime minister ordering the IDF to seize control of the entire Gaza Strip, Smotrich said he does not believe Netanyahu intends to completely take control of Gaza.
“That’s not how you subdue, that’s not how to return hostages, that’s not how a war is won,” Smotrich said. “To send tens of thousands of fighters to maneuver in the city of Gaza while risking their lives, paying heavy political and international prices, just to put pressure on Hamas to release hostages, and then withdraw back – it is immoral and illogical folly.”
“Unfortunately, for the first time since the beginning of the war, I feel I just can’t stand behind this decision and back it up. My conscience does not allow this,” he continued.
IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir also opposed Netanyahu’s plan, presenting his own proposal to the Security Cabinet, according to reports in Hebrew media. Zamir warned that the proposed plan would endanger the hostages while increasing the strain on the IDF.
On Thursday night, the Cabinet voted to adopt Netanyahu’s proposal. Maariv quoted the prime minister telling Zamir after the vote: “The plan you presented will not help the return of the hostages. The plan we have now approved will more effectively achieve the goals of the war.”
Zamir had reportedly noted that the evacuation of around one million Palestinians near Gaza City, in the central part of the enclave, is a complex process that could not be completed in the proposal’s timeframe.
Smotrich also blasted Netanyahu for appearing to support a plan that would guarantee victory over Hamas, only to make “a U-turn.”
“In recent weeks, I have worked intensively with the prime minister on a dramatic move to win in Gaza,” Smotrich said. “A combination of a quick military decision and an immediate political move that will exact a painful price from Hamas, destroy its military and civilian capabilities, exert unprecedented pressure on it to release the hostages and raise the spirit of the people of Israel. For weeks, it seemed that the prime minister supported the plan, he discussed its details with me and broadcast that he was going to a decision and that this time he intended to go all the way, but unfortunately he made a U-turn.”
Smotrich said that Netanyahu and the cabinet “gave in to weakness.”
“The prime minister and the Cabinet gave in to weaknesses, let emotion prevail over their senses, and decided to do more of the same again, and to embark on a military move whose purpose is not decisiveness, but only to exert pressure on Hamas in order to bring it to a partial hostage deal,” he stated.
On Sunday morning, Smotrich allegedly expressed a willingness to go to elections.
“As far as I’m concerned, it is possible to stop everything and let the people decide,” Smotrich was quoted as saying by public broadcaster Kan News.
Smotrich’s opinion appeared to be shared by others in his party. Religious Zionism party Knesset Member Zvi Sukkot said this morning on Army Radio: “In the current state of affairs, I think we should go to elections.”
Members of the Jewish Power party also expressed a willingness to go to elections. Knesset Member Yitzhak Kreuzer told 103FM Radio that the party will consider going to elections if the proposal does not lead to “the complete defeat of the terror organizations in the Gaza Strip.”
“There may come a point where we will have to return the mandate to the citizens of the State of Israel, when this government is certainly acting against the opinion of its own voters,” Kreuzer said. “When the prime minister leads the Knesset to provide aid and again maneuvers to reach a partial deal, we are certainly very opposed to that.”
In his remarks, Smotrich urged Netanyahu to change his mind.
“It’s not too late to reconsider,” Smotrich said, addressing Netanyahu. “Convene the cabinet again, and announce in no uncertain terms that there will be no more halfway measures. That there will be no more partial deals. That this time, we are moving towards a clear and decisive course of action leading to victory, culminating in the complete surrender of Hamas and the return of all hostages in a single operation, or its complete defeat and destruction. Annexation of large parts of the Gaza Strip and opening its gates to voluntary migration.”
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.
Clearly Hamas has managed to fool some of the most intelligent people in many governments. What is it that these people don’t understand about a terrorist bunch that openly advocates for the extermination of the J’s in the mid-East? If those nations that wish recognize Gaza as a state would offer them dirt in their country I would not think them hypocrites but they are hypocrites. The only way Israel will ever be able to live in peace is if Arabs in Gaze and the West bank are moved a state in France, Australia, Canada, the Vatican, Great Britain and ten other Muslim nations. Not one of these nations care one whit for the thugs in Gaza, the West Bank or Beirut.
Even if they accepted a place in another country, they would take vacations in Israel and terrorize them. These J. haters need to be extinguished just like they wish to extinguish the J’s.