(Natural News)—Four years after the Biden administration imposed a controversial COVID-19 vaccine mandate on the U.S. military, thousands of veterans and former service members are still fighting for justice. The 2021 directive, issued by then-Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, led to the discharge of over 8,500 active-duty troops who refused to comply with the vaccine requirement—many citing religious or medical objections.
- Thousands of veterans still affected by COVID vaccine mandate: Over 8,500 service members were discharged under the Pentagon’s 2021 COVID-19 vaccine mandate, with many still seeking justice and compensation for lost careers, benefits, and disrupted lives.
- Legal action intensifies for reinstatement and compensation: The law firm Military Back Pay is leading multiple class-action lawsuits, including Harkins v. U.S. and Bassen v. U.S., on behalf of veterans denied religious exemptions or discharged near retirement, representing over 700 plaintiffs.
- Trump’s executive order offers partial relief: While Donald Trump has issued an executive order for backpay and reinstatement, some lawsuits remain active as veterans wait to see if the promised relief materializes fully.
- Lingering career and institutional damage: Despite the mandate’s repeal in 2023, affected service members still face stalled careers and advancement barriers, with legal experts warning of long-term damage to military morale and institutional trust.
Veterans still battling for justice four years after Pentagon’s COVID vaccine crackdown
Although the mandate was officially repealed in 2023 through the National Defense Authorization Act, its effects linger. Many affected service members have faced long-term career and financial consequences, including blocked promotions, early dismissals, and lost retirement benefits. Now, hundreds are turning to the courts in hopes of securing redress.
Leading the legal charge is the firm Military Back Pay, which is spearheading three class-action lawsuits to secure compensation and reinstatement for those discharged. Among the plaintiffs are Chris Harkins, a highly decorated Coast Guard officer who was denied a religious exemption just months before qualifying for retirement, and Nick Bassen, an Army sergeant discharged despite being partially disabled and weeks away from finishing his service. Both men lost not only their military careers but also financial security and housing—Bassen, for instance, became homeless with a pregnant wife following his separation.
“It’s hard for me to do these interviews,” Harkins admitted, highlighting the emotional toll the ordeal has taken on him and his family. Bassen echoed similar frustration: “They elected to kick me out instead of letting me stay in and finish out my retirement process.”
These cases—Harkins v. United States, Bassen v. United States, and Botello v. United States—collectively represent over 700 plaintiffs. The Botello case, in particular, addresses the plight of reservists and National Guard members who were similarly barred from service due to their refusal to be vaccinated. Military Back Pay filed for class-action certification on July 9, with the Botello case heard in court just two days later on July 11.
Bassen’s lawsuit was paused in May following an executive order by former President Donald Trump offering backpay and reinstatement to service members affected by the vaccine mandate. However, plaintiffs in paused cases may still resume legal proceedings if they believe the government’s restitution is insufficient.
Veterans’ attorney Dale Saran, who previously defended military personnel during the anthrax vaccine controversy in the early 2000s, compared the COVID vaccine mandate to a “loyalty test” and warned of its broader implications. “People do not appreciate the institutional level damage that did to the military,” Saran said, suggesting that morale, trust in leadership, and cohesion have been deeply harmed.
Despite the mandate’s repeal, many affected veterans continue to face barriers to reentry, blocked advancement opportunities, and a lack of formal apology or full benefits restoration. As these legal battles unfold, they underscore lingering questions about medical freedom, religious rights, and accountability within the U.S. armed forces. For now, the fight for justice continues—not only in courtrooms but in the personal lives of veterans still navigating the fallout.
The Department of Justice has declined to comment on the pending litigation.
Bookmark plague.info to your favorite independent websites for updates on TWO HUNDRED new gain-of-function viruses NIH, CDC and WHO plan to release into the “wild” while blaming infected bat soup eaters at the Wuhan wet market. Never get force injected with prions again, even if you’re in the military.
Sources for this article include:
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.