No Result
View All Result
Friday, August 14, 2026
Patriot TV Defenders Members
Patriot TV
  • Home
    • About
  • Posts
  • Home
    • About
  • Posts
No Result
View All Result
PatriotTV
No Result
View All Result
Home News
Marc Benioff

Democrat Megadonor Shocks Party After Calling for National Guard in San Francisco

by Crime Beat
October 12, 2025
Listen to "Patriot TV" on Spreaker.

Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff, a heavyweight in Democratic fundraising circles, has broken ranks with his party by backing President Donald Trump’s push to deploy the National Guard in San Francisco amid soaring crime and disorder. Benioff’s comments, made during a New York Times interview, come as the city grapples with years of failed policies that have left streets overrun with open drug markets, rampant theft, and unchecked homelessness.

Benioff didn’t hold back in praising the administration’s approach. “I fully support the president,” he said. “I think he’s doing a great job.”

He went further, endorsing the idea of federal troops stepping in to bolster what he sees as a severe shortage of local police—estimating the city needs about 1,000 more officers to restore order. This stance marks a stark shift for Benioff, who has poured millions into liberal causes, including a 2018 ballot measure that hiked business taxes to fund homeless programs, and even hosted a lavish fundraiser for Hillary Clinton at his Presidio mansion.

The call echoes Trump’s own Oval Office remarks from August, where he listed Democratic-run cities plagued by chaos and vowed action.

“You look at what the Democrats have done to San Francisco—they’ve destroyed it,” Trump said. “We’ll clean that one up, too.”

Benioff, a close ally of California Governor Gavin Newsom—serving as godfather to one of Newsom’s children—now finds himself at odds with state leaders who are suing the Trump administration over similar Guard deployments in Los Angeles.

San Francisco’s downward spiral isn’t new, but it’s accelerated under progressive governance that prioritizes permissive approaches over enforcement. Despite Newsom’s early promises as mayor to tackle homelessness, the crisis has exploded, with tent encampments, fentanyl-fueled overdoses, and brazen shoplifting forcing major retailers to shutter stores. Critics argue this isn’t mere incompetence but a deliberate erosion of law and order, where soft-on-crime district attorneys and defund-the-police rhetoric have empowered criminals while handcuffing cops.

Benioff’s pivot suggests even deep-pocketed insiders are fed up, especially as his own Dreamforce conference looms—he’s hiring hundreds of off-duty officers to secure the event, admitting, “When you walk through San Francisco next week, there will be cops on every corner. That’s how it used to be.”

Show Fastest Growing

Local Democrats aren’t taking it lightly. City Supervisor Matt Dorsey blasted the idea on X as “a slap in the face to San Francisco,” insisting it’s an insult to the police force they’ve been trying to rebuild. State Senator Scott Wiener called it an “illegal military occupation,” while Assemblyman Matt Haney decried it as a “direct assault” on the city. Their outrage rings hollow to many, given how quickly the streets were cleaned up for a Chinese delegation visit last year—proving the mess is fixable when political will exists, but apparently not for everyday residents.

Benioff’s remarks have rippled through tech circles, with White House adviser David Sacks celebrating the defection on X. As more Silicon Valley figures quietly align with Trump-era policies on security and economic revival, it exposes the cracks in the left’s grip on California. If a megadonor like Benioff is willing to invite federal intervention, it raises questions about who’s really pulling the strings in these failing blue strongholds—and whether the chaos serves some hidden agenda to keep power centralized in Sacramento and beyond.

Donation

Buy author a coffee

Donate
At last, a conservative news aggregator that does not bow to the woke right.
Listen to "Patriot TV" on Spreaker.





Two Storms, One Harvest

Empty Shelves

Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.

What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.

Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.

This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.

Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.

Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.

The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running

While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.

The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.

Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.

The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.

Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.

The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?

The System Has No Slack Left

The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.

Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.

There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.

The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.

What Joseph Knew

Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.

Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.

Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.

Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.

None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.

Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.

Please login to join discussion
  • About
  • Politics
  • Conspiracy
  • Culture
  • Financial
  • Geopolitics
  • Faith
  • Survival
© 2026 Patriot TV.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • About
  • Posts

© 2026 Patriot TV.