(The Center Square)–On the third to last day of session, the Texas legislature advanced a two-year $338 billion budget that fiscal conservatives argue is “California style budgeting.”
The Texas House and Senate approved a conference committee bill Saturday that finalized SB 1, the state’s budget.
“Texas becomes stronger and stronger each biennium because our conservative principles guide our approach to budgeting,” Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said. “These principles have kept our state on the right track and will continue to do so for years to come. The Senate’s All Funds budget for Texas was 1.2% larger than last biennium, well within our limit of population growth times inflation.”
Patrick says the bill commits “a record $51 billion for property tax relief” with “nearly one out of every four dollars in state funds” devoted to property tax relief. The budget also includes a record $8.5 billion for public education funding, The Center Square reported.
With record high spending, the legislature still kept the budget conservative, Patrick argued, “with billions of dollars unspent and without touching the rainy day fund” that will “keep our state prosperous over the next biennium and beyond.”
Despite Texas posting a $24 billion surplus and calls from fiscal conservatives to cut spending, waste, fraud and abuse, and implement meaningful tax reform, the Republican-led legislature expanded spending and spent the surplus.
Patrick said the state’s $338 billion All Funds budget was a 1.2% increase from the last biennium; the $237.1 billion All State Funds budget was a 4.8% increase.
These and other claims made by Republicans in support of the budget are “wildly misleading,” economist Vance Ginn argues in an analysis. Ginn helped author the 2017 federal tax cuts under President Donald Trump, led tax policy at the Texas Public Policy Foundation and now runs an Austin-based consulting firm.
If the budget “is what passes for fiscal conservatism in Texas, then California-style budgeting has officially arrived in the Lone Star State,” Ginn said. “Texans aren’t seeing relief – they’re seeing rising tax bills.”
The $51 billion claim refers to “every dollar allocated to property tax relief since 2019, spanning four budget cycles: 2020–21 through 2026–27,” Ginn said, not from a single two-year budget approved on Saturday. Since 2019, the legislature appropriated roughly $1.16 trillion in total funds, meaning “‘record tax relief’ equals just 4.4% of overall appropriations – while the other 95.6%, or $1.1 trillion, went to growing government,” Ginn said.
“Of the $51 billion, only $3.5 billion is truly new property tax relief,” Ginn added. Another $3 billion in property tax relief was already included in current law, after the legislature enacted HB 3 in 2019, which automatically implements relief “unless the Legislature deliberately chooses not to fund it,” he said. “At most, only $3.5 billion of new relief is at stake – barely a drop in the bucket” compared to the state’s $24 billion surplus.
State Rep. Brian Harrison, R-Waxahachie, said the budget that passed is “the most bloated, liberal, budget ever written in the history of the state of Texas.”
Instead of returning the $24 billion surplus to “the overtaxed, hard working men and women of the state of Texas,” the budget “funds just about every liberal priority under the sun,” he said. The budget includes “doubling down and increasing budgets for state agencies and entities that are engaged in DEI and transgender ideology” and “puts crony corporatism and corporate welfare on steroids.”
More importantly, he argues, is what the budget doesn’t do: reduce property taxes.
“The men and women of the state of Texas wanted us to do just one thing this session … only one thing … to get the crushing burden of property taxes under control,” and the legislature “abjectly failed.”
Based on current projections and what’s in the budget, “the vast majority of property taxpayers and property tax bills in the state of Texas are going to go up,” Harrison said. “This budget represents an absolute betrayal of the hard-working men and women of the state of Texas and they deserve better. There is no way a fiscally conservative Republican” could vote for it.
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.