(The Epoch Times)—The good news came on Heather Knuckles’s wedding day: her mother, bedridden with a failing liver and kidneys, had an organ match.
It was the happiest day of their lives, Knuckles said, recalling her mother smiling while picturing a new life in front of her.
Instead, she said, what began was a nightmare.
Knuckles’s mother, Mary Ann Hollis, underwent liver and kidney transplants on Oct. 30, 2022. Five days after the surgery, doctors told the family that the donor liver had a previously unreported issue—a rare and deadly form of cancer.
Hollis soon had a second surgery to replace the liver, a four-hour procedure that left her fragile and in delirium.
By Christmas, she was on a feeding tube, and family members crowded her bedside to open gifts she was too weak to open by herself. She died three weeks later, with a solid mass developing in her body.
What killed her was the same cancer—undifferentiated adenocarcinoma—from the donor whose organs Knuckles said should have never been eligible for transplant in the first place.
Three years later, with new national scrutiny on the U.S. organ transplant system and its procurement process, she is now demanding accountability.
“No one should ever have to experience what my mother and our family has endured,” she told lawmakers at a Dec. 2 congressional hearing amid the ongoing inquiry into the nonprofits facilitating organ donations and transplants known as Organ Procurement Organization (OPO).
And her story was far from an outlier.
‘Inhumane’
At the hearing, whistleblowers testified to patients on the brink of getting their organs removed when they showed clear signs of life, donor organs being discarded, and concerns of potential malpractice silenced.
One witness is Nyckoletta Martin, a former surgical preservation coordinator with Kentucky Organ Donor Affiliates, which later merged with another OPO to form the Network for Hope in October 2024.
The hospital in 2021 received TJ Hoover, who was in cardiac arrest and remained unresponsive for days. He woke up in the operating room just as doctors were assessing whether his organs were healthy enough for donation. But instead of immediately halting the procedure, Martin said, medical staff allegedly sedated him to stop his movement, alarming some staffers who called the actions “inhumane” and akin to “human euthanasia.”
Network for Hope is one of 55 OPOs in the United States tasked with recovering organs for transplantation.
A federal probe in July uncovered more than 100 cases in which organ procurement began when patients were still showing signs of life. Following that, the Department of Health and Human Services decertified an organ procurement group, saying it was a warning to other transplant procurement networks.
Jennifer Erickson, senior fellow for organ donation policy at the Federation of American Scientists, describes America as having reached national-crisis levels of corruption at OPOs.
“Taxpayer-funded OPOs operate with virtually no accountability, and OPOs have pressured grieving families and, in the most horrifying cases, targeted patients who aren’t even dead,” she told lawmakers.
Whistleblowers told Erickson they have been trained to “target inexperienced physicians, especially in rural America” to worsen patients’ conditions by over-administering comfort medications, such as fentanyl, she said.
Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.) later circled back to this point.
“Isn’t this essentially trying to kill people in order to get their organs?” he asked.
Erickson replied: “I want to be absolutely clear, the things we are talking about are crimes.
“That is not just a danger to the people who live there. It’s a danger to any American who travels through any of these states where whistleblowers have shared these practices happen.”
Charles Bearden, America’s longest-serving transplant coordinator, who passed away in the summer, once “literally covered a patient with his own body to stop dangerous OPOs from harming patients who could otherwise survive,” Erickson said.
“The line between organ donation and organ harvesting is consent. No family would consent to a loved one being wheeled into or to have their organs removed when they could survive. Yet that’s what’s happening across the country.”
Silenced
After what happened to Hoover, Martin said that several staff had wanted to report the case to the appropriate authorities, but they were told the OPO would deal with the matter internally, she said.
“Our access to TJ’s records was restricted. We were silenced.”
Martin quit her job over the facility’s handling of the case and was fired by her new employer, Buckeye Transplant, after she spoke publicly about the issue.
Martin said she saw a pattern while reading a letter from the House Ways and Means Oversight Subcommittee to the New Jersey Organ and Tissue Sharing Network, an OPO that the committee is investigating over Medicare fraud concerns.
Over a dozen whistleblowers have brought forth concerning allegations of directives being given for organ procurement to proceed after a patient showed signs of life and deletion of documentation. The letter further cited Excel sheets from the organization allegedly showing mass discarding of pancreases, collected in the name of research but apparently meant to improve metrics instead, the committee said.
The parallels between her experience and the whistleblower allegations in the letter were “unmistakable,” said Martin, highlighting “systemic failures that demand urgent accountability and reform.”
The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), which manages the national organ waiting list and matching system under federal contract, had threatened legal action against witnesses from a previous House hearing, Erickson said, citing local media reports from Richmond, where the organization is based.
The nonprofit, in a Dec. 2 statement, said it “adheres to whistleblower protection laws and does not tolerate, or engage in, retaliation against whistleblowers.”
“UNOS has never engaged in any unlawful behavior. Any statement to the contrary is outrageous and actionable in court,” it added.
Reached by The Epoch Times, the network pointed to a July testimony by UNOS CEO Maureen McBride in Congress, in which she suggested creating a “no wrong door” patient safety reporting system to address potential concerns. The Knuckles’s mother’s case is “deeply disturbing,” McBride said, but UNOS doesn’t regulate OPOs or transplant hospitals, nor participate in clinical decision-making.
Barry Massa, CEO of Network for Hope, said the claims from the hearing “do not reflect the positive impact of Network for Hope since its merger.”
For people working at OPOs, Martin’s advice is “don’t be afraid.”
“We are on the front lines. We are that patient’s advocate. That’s what we all sign up for, right?” she said. “We are protected in ways, but at the end of the day, you know, we’re all here to save lives. We can’t let this keep continuing to go on.”
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.