(The Epoch Times)—Low incentives and complicated state regulations, combined with high housing and business costs, have rendered California unable to keep Hollywood from moving production to other states and countries, according to an entertainment industry report released on May 27 by the Milken Institute, a California-based think tank.
Hollywood’s in-state production has dropped in the past two years as other states and international destinations continue to increase industry incentives, according to the report’s authors, Kevin Klowden, executive director for the Milken Institute Finance, and Madeleine Waddoups, a graduate teaching assistant in the Luskin School of Public Affairs at the University of California–Los Angeles.
The industry has contributed for more than a century to the state’s cultural and physical exports, has a huge impact on tourism, and has also boosted the fields of design, technology, and innovative manufacturing, according to the report, adding that numerous other industries depend on the movie and television business and its contribution to the state’s identity, jobs, and exports.
The industry has seen many highs and lows in California over the past 100 years or more, but has never faced the “wide ranging” threat now posed to production after television reached its peak in 2021, the authors said.
“The consequences for California have been significant,” the institute said.
The Golden State lost $4.14 billion in industry output and more than 17,200 jobs from 2019 to 2023.
“While most states other than New York cannot compete with California’s combination of skilled workers and filming infrastructure, California’s base 20 percent incentives, combined with dramatically higher housing and business costs, have left the state uncompetitive,” the institute found.
A “base 20 percent incentive” means the tax credit in California starts at 20 percent of a film producer’s in-state spending, up to a specified amount.
Previous disruptions to the entertainment industry in California have involved the advent of television in the late 1940s, a strong dollar in the 1990s, and competitive film incentives in the early 2010s, the report said.
But Hollywood has never faced several issues at the same time, as it has recently, according to the institute.
“Combined with high levels of financial strain facing the studios in the wake of the 2023 strikes, driven by stagnating streaming growth and the loss of prior revenue streams in DVDs and broadcast television, the need to find less expensive locations has never been stronger,” the institute reported.
The consequent impact on the state’s workers and businesses—inside the industry and supporting it—“has never been felt more quickly and more severely,” according to the study.
Streaming growth has slowed nationally. From 2019 to 2023, revenue from streaming content increased by 150 percent.
That growth is expected to slow significantly, however.
Pricewaterhouse Coopers, which provides professional services to the global entertainment and media industry, projects only 30 percent growth in streaming revenue from 2023 to 2028, according to the Milken Institute.
The report authors don’t see that as “enough to offset the decline in revenue and demand from movies, broadcast, television, and cable,” they wrote in the executive summary.
National entertainment jobs also decreased by nearly 14 percent from 2019 to 2023. The number of productions peaked around 2016, the institute reported.
From the spring of 2019 to the spring of 2024, entertainment jobs dropped by 15 percent in California, the institute reported. Adding to the pain, working hours and wages in California’s entertainment industry did not bounce back after the 2023 writers and actors strikes during the union-driven national “summer of strikes.”
The five-month writers strike was declared over in September 2023 after they reached an agreement with major studios that included significant multi-year pay raises, more health insurance contributions, regulations on the use of artificial intelligence (AI), and other production guarantees.
The actors settled their contract with studios two months later. Their $1 billion contract also includes pay increases, AI regulations, and the introduction of streaming participation bonuses.
According to the Milken study, workers in the entertainment industry worked an average of 28.5 weekly hours and earned an average of $30.84 per hour in 2023. In 2024, from January to November, that number dropped to 27.3 average weekly hours and $27.38 in average hourly earnings.
“The problem is particularly noteworthy in filming activity within Los Angeles County,” the institute reported.
Since 2019, the number of on-location filming days has dropped by nearly 36 percent in Los Angeles, and soundstage filming days dropped by nearly 30 percent, according to FilmLA, a film office for the city and county of Los Angeles and other local jurisdictions.
Outside competition has strengthened since 2014. Other states are increasing incentives to attract productions. New York has grown its annual incentives funding from 2022 to 2025, raising the budget to $700 million per year and increasing the base credit rate to 30 percent.
Texas is also expected to increase its biannual incentives to nearly $500 million per year by the end of 2025, according to the report.
California allocates $330 million.
The Milken Institute recommended several actions to address the lack of work before the loss of talented workers, prop houses, costume shops, catering firms, camera rentals, and other businesses “becomes irrecoverable.”
The institute recommended increasing the state’s film incentive rates to a base of 30 percent and offering at least $700 million in production incentives per year. The changes would generate nearly $3 billion in additional entertainment spending in California and nearly $6 billion in total output to the state’s economy, according to the report.
Another idea was to address gaps in productions, include shorter-form shows of less than 40 minutes, and increase coverage for independent films and mid-budget productions that provide consistent streams of regular local work.
The institute also suggested moving to a year-round schedule for allocating tax incentives and improving the state’s regulatory processes for applying for the credits.
The report also mentioned streamlining and improving local filmmaking permits and easing restrictions on the use of local buildings.
Local, state, and federal officials have responded to the entertainment industry crisis in California in the past few months.
In May, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass issued an executive directive to support local production and boost jobs. The order aims to lower costs, streamline city processes, and increase access to iconic city locations.
In October 2024, Gov. Gavin Newsom proposed a plan to expand the tax credit program for the film and television industry to $750 million—more than double the current $330 million allocation.
And President Donald Trump also announced on May 4 that he authorized his administration to impose a 100 percent tariff on movies produced outside the United States as a way to protect the industry.
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.