No Result
View All Result
Saturday, May 2, 2026
Patriot TV Defenders Members
Patriot TV
  • Home
    • About
  • Posts
  • Home
    • About
  • Posts
No Result
View All Result
PatriotTV
No Result
View All Result
Home Articles Curated
Mark Rutte NATO

Are They Setting the Stage for NATO to Officially Enter the War With Russia?

by Michael Snyder
September 5, 2025

(End of the American Dream)—Why are the Europeans organizing a “coalition of the willing” to send peacekeeping troops to Ukraine when the Russians have repeatedly stated that they will never accept any western peacekeeping troops in Ukraine?  Are the Europeans just being delusional, or is something else going on here?  When I learned that French President Emmanuel Macron had announced that 26 western countries had agreed to deploy troops to Ukraine immediately after a ceasefire deal is reached, I was deeply alarmed…

Twenty-six Western allies have formally committed to deploying troops “by land, sea or air” to Ukraine the day after a ceasefire deal is agreed, Emmanuel Macron has said.

The French leader made the announcement after a summit of 35 countries dubbed the “Coalition of the Willing”.

Macron and other western leaders know that Russia will never agree to any deal that would allow western troops to enter Ukraine.

On Wednesday, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova reaffirmed this yet again…

Russia once again rejected the idea of foreign troops being stationed in Ukraine. This comes as European leaders met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and held a joint call with President Donald Trump.

On Thursday, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said any plan to have foreign military personnel deployed to Ukraine would be “unacceptable” to Moscow, Reuters reported.

“Russia is not going to discuss a foreign intervention in Ukraine in any form or format that is fundamentally unacceptable and undermines any security,” Zakharova told reporters, according to Reuters.

So why are the Europeans preparing to do something that Russia will never agree to?

Well, for one thing western leaders do not believe that the Russians should have any say in the matter.  The head of NATO made that exceedingly clear on Thursday…

Nato chief Mark Rutte said on Thursday that Russia had no veto on Western troops being deployed to Ukraine: “Why are we interested in what Russia thinks about troops in Ukraine? It’s a sovereign country. It’s not for them to decide.”

There is no doubt in my mind that the Europeans plan to send troops to Ukraine once the war is over whether Russia likes it or not.

But could it be possible that the Europeans are actually planning to send troops to Ukraine before the war is over?

The Ukrainians have already lost 1.7 million soldiers, and they need reinforcements desperately.



If they do not get those reinforcements, they will steadily lose more land.

And I think that it is a very troubling sign that hospitals in Europe have been instructed to be ready to treat large numbers of wounded European soldiers by March 2026…

French hospitals have been ordered to make preparations for an imminent war in Europe as Germany says it is on alert for Russia’s military drills.

France’s ministry of health has told health bodies across the country to prepare for a possible ‘major engagement’ by March 2026, according to documents obtained by Le Canard Enchaîné.

The French government is predicting a scenario where the nation would become a supporting state that has the capacity to take a massive number of wounded soldiers from France and other European nations.

Why would hospitals in France be told to prepare for such a scenario if there is going to be a peace agreement?

Of course the truth is that there isn’t going to be a peace agreement.

Ukraine will never willingly give up the territory that Russia is demanding, and Russia will never agree to allow European peacekeeping troops in Ukraine.

All along, one of Russia’s primary goals has been to keep NATO completely out of Ukraine.

Of course one of Volodymyr Zelensky’s primary goals has been to drag NATO directly into the war.  This is something that former Polish President Andrzej Duda spoke about earlier this week…

Vladimir Zelensky’s “dream” is to draw NATO directly into the conflict with Russia on Ukraine’s behalf, former Polish President Andrzej Duda said Tuesday.

Speaking in an interview with journalist Bogdan Rymanowski, Duda recalled an incident in November 2022, when a Ukrainian air defense missile struck near a Polish border village, killing one person. Zelensky immediately blamed Russia and urged Warsaw to invoke NATO’s collective defense clause.

Duda said the Ukrainian leader pressured him to publicly declare the weapon Russian in origin, which he refused to do.

Do you remember that false flag incident from November 2022?

I do.

Thankfully we were not dragged into a direct war with Russia at that time, but the danger is still there.

In fact, I am extremely concerned about what Ukraine’s new Flamingo cruise missile will mean for the conflict…

Ukraine has revealed a powerful new weapon that could shift the balance of its conflict with Russia — the Flamingo cruise missile. Developed by defense startup Fire Point, the missile is said to be capable of carrying a 2,535-pound warhead and striking targets up to 3,000 kilometers away, signaling a major leap in Kyiv’s domestic arms production.

Ukraine does not have many of these cruise missiles yet, but they are expected to enter mass production by the end of this year…

Advisor Bullion Numismatics

Fire Point currently manufactures one Flamingo missile per day, with plans to scale up to seven daily by October 2025 — potentially 2,500+ units annually.

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy expects mass production by December 2025, as Ukraine accelerates toward becoming the so-called “Silicon Valley of defense.”

If Flamingo cruise missiles start slamming into major Russian cities, the Russians may respond with overwhelming force.

If the Russians respond with overwhelming force, European leaders may use that as justification to send troops to Ukraine.

And once European troops start dying in Ukraine, we will be just one step away from nuclear war.

President Trump has tried to bring an end to the conflict in Ukraine, but the Ukrainians are not going to back down from their most essential positions and the Russians are not going to back down from their most essential positions.

So the war continues, and Russian forces are steadily moving forward.

As Russian forces take more ground, the Ukrainians will become increasingly desperate to find a way to drag NATO directly into the war.

Jase Medical Medically Prepared

If the Ukrainians are ultimately successful in dragging NATO directly into the war, the entire future of our civilization will be at risk.

Michael’s new book entitled “10 Prophetic Events That Are Coming Next” is available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.com, and you can subscribe to his Substack newsletter at michaeltsnyder.substack.com.

Donation

Buy author a coffee

Donate
JD's Aggregator
Listen to "Patriot TV" on Spreaker.





Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare

America First Healthcare

In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.

America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.

The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.

These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.

High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.

Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.

Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.

Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.

Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.

Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.

Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.

In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.

America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.

Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.

Comments 12

  1. a Call for Honesty says:
    8 months ago

    If the citizens of EU countries, UK and US had to vote on whether to send their sons and brothers and fathers to war with Russia most would vote NO but sadly nearly all their politicians are really more interested in seeking to destroy Russia than work for peace.

    Reply
    • Michael says:
      8 months ago

      Don’t know that it’s even about destroying Russsia … might be a nice, secondary benefit. Look at the countries banging the war drums the loudest. France, Germany, and UK. What do they have in common? Struggling economies, high unemployment, high crime rates due to rampant migration, government censorship, the outlawing of political parties, the smearing and cancellation of anyone that questions anything the government says, and a native population that’s had about enough of the twits running their country, and even more unhappy with the unelected corruptocrats in Brussels.
      The war drums are playing a familiar tune — distract, distract, distract. The politicians think those drums have a good beat, and you can dance to it.

      Reply
  2. The Prisoner says:
    8 months ago

    Notice that none of the states which border Russia are sounding a battle cry.

    It’s the same nations that started WW1 & WW2 that again want a huge war.

    Without the USA joining them, it is not NATO.

    Reply
  3. Bill Halcott says:
    8 months ago

    We have lost our minds. I stand with President Trump and his efforts at making peace. So many fools on both sides are sliding down the razor blade of escalation ending in nuclear war and the destruction of all life on planet Earth. We have lost our minds. America First! ULTRAMAGA!

    Reply
  4. John C says:
    8 months ago

    Voldemort Zelenskyy and the corrupt European politicians who are pushing this nonsense, and making a ton of money off of it, need to be removed from power. Zelenskyy is an illegitimate ruler in Ukraine, his term expired and he is still there and refuses to hold elections , like the dictator he is. If Zelenskyy was gone tomorrow, things would improve quickly.

    Reply
  5. 8675310 says:
    8 months ago

    Get out of NATO, now!

    Reply
  6. Nick Rockway says:
    8 months ago

    Zelensky’s goal is to remain in power and reinstigate the oppression of Ethnic Russians in the Donbas – to the point of ethnically cleansing it.

    Russia’s goal is to protect Russians in the Donbas, eliminate as many military age Ukies as possible – so it will take generations for them to recover their manpower, and turn the Ukraine into a neutral buffer state against continued NATO expansion.

    Europe’s goal is to pressure Russia to a collapse and claim her resources – reminiscent of someone’s plan for leibenstraum in the 1930’s.

    The US needs to reign in a Europe that is descending into authoritarianism and madness – and if need be, ally with Russia against the war mongers.

    Reply
  7. Ron Baxter says:
    8 months ago

    Do you think for a second that Russia doesn’t have the ability to destroy any facility in Ukraine in a heartbeat that could produce the weapons you describe above that could reach Moscow? And they can do so to Germany or France as well if they chose to join Ukraine in this battle. NATO support for Ukraine in this war is THE barrier to a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia. Ukraine has lost the war and a ton of its soldiers. The losing side is not the one that sets the terms for a settlement between two warring parties.

    Reply
  8. TheTruthBurns says:
    8 months ago

    Past time to make non Russian Fukraine Extinct – Make it a Wasteland & Bomb everything of any significant value – make the rest of the Fukrainians leave to all the Other Barbarian Cuntries of Eurotrashland – Over 500 years of Colonial Warmongering Demonic Filth is coming to an end – time to meet your Master Satan Demonic Scum.

    Reply
  9. Shrugged says:
    8 months ago

    Why is the US in NATO. Get out of NATO and kick the UN out of New York.

    Reply
  10. Linda says:
    8 months ago

    A president that is truly interested in peace doesn’t keep funneling money and armaments to countries participating in the war effort! If countries wanted peace, all they had to do was to follow the Minsk agreement! Europe wants war because they’re broke! Neocons think that they’re going to be able to beat Russia, divide it up, and split up the $75 trillion worth of natural resources! Martin Armstrong’s Socrates computer says they’re to get their war, Ukraine will flatline, and the EU is going to bust apart!
    NATO will lose! I don’t think it’s looking all that good for the US either!

    Reply
  11. RCM says:
    8 months ago

    Wuttamess

    Reply

Leave a Reply to RCM Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • About
  • Politics
  • Conspiracy
  • Culture
  • Financial
  • Geopolitics
  • Faith
  • Survival
© 2026 Patriot TV.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • About
  • Posts

© 2026 Patriot TV.