Perhaps I’m being too optimistic, but I think fewer people are buying into the hardcore cult propaganda that Marxist-globalists rain down on the world every day.
I see a few more rolled eyes around me when someone blames a thunderstorm on “climate change.” The last few stragglers of committed COVID-hyperventilators have taken off their paper masks when out in public (and have pleasantly discovered that abnormally rapid breathing disappears once dirty rags are removed from one’s face). I’ve heard more “trans”-enablers stating clearly that biological boys should not be in girls’ locker rooms or competing in their sports. More celebrities and academics (many of whom have proudly identified as atheists in the recent past) have begun to read the Bible and openly discuss the teachings of Jesus Christ.
Is the world healing? Has the ideological pendulum begun to swing back toward sanity? Have the Marxist-globalists dosed the world with so much propaganda over the years that the effectiveness of their lies is starting to fade? Does that mean the last century of Marxist-globalist sociological conditioning is beginning to wear off?
I think the lies that Marxist-globalists regularly tell have become too preposterous for the average person to swallow anymore.
Last week, the apocalypse-whisperer Al Gore was at a Hollywood “climate change” event honoring how wonderfully stupid all his celebrity friends are. Joined by The West Wing alum Bradley Whitford, both men discussed the likelihood that Earth will descend into another ice age in ten to twenty-five years. They referenced Roland Emmerich’s 2004 wintry disaster movie, The Day After Tomorrow, in describing what we should expect. Prepare for snowdrifts!
Listening to this kind of doomsaying-lunacy-bordering-on-sexual-fetish, the average person says to himself, “I thought you told us that ‘global warming’ was going to incinerate us? Now you’re predicting snow?” Gore’s wildly inaccurate, scaremongering, anti-science, fever dream, An Inconvenient Truth, predicted that the Arctic Ocean’s summer ice would be gone by 2013 (wrong!) and that Mt. Kilimanjaro would have no snow by 2015 (also wrong!).
The snake oil salesman who became filthy rich by selling disaster porn to the world promised that rising temperatures would soon (as in at least a decade ago!) leave Manhattan and Miami under twenty feet of water. Now, in 2026, apparently “global warming” is so last decade’s fashion, and we’re back to “global cooling” again! We already did “global cooling” during the 1970s! Does that mean bell-bottoms, disco, “blaxploitation” films, and kung fu will be making comebacks, too?
A century of the “little boy who cried wolf” telling us that using hydrocarbon fuels (or what the oh-so-educated “elites” among us call “fossil fuels” in order to pretend that everything runs on dinosaurs) would cause the planet to freeze…or perhaps burn…or maybe change our climate (Duh, the climate is always naturally changing, you idiots!)…or produce a tornado somewhere in the Midwest…has forced a lot of people to ask, “Why should we trust ‘The Science’ when ‘The Science’ sounds a lot like propaganda?”
When Marxist-globalists doubled down by turning a fifteen-year-old Swedish girl, Greta Thunberg, into the world’s leading authority on “climate science,” people capable of thinking beyond the limits of government programming finally had enough.
Then some people wondered: If man-made “global warming” is just a government scam meant to justify new taxes and more burdensome impositions upon personal freedom, what other lies might Marxist-globalists tell? Ding-ding-ding, welcome to COVID! Let’s be honest: A lot of people who had figured out the “Global Warming/Cooling/Climate Change/Extreme Weather” Hoax should not have fallen for the COVID Hoax. Come on, guys; the Marxist-globalists ran the exact same apocalyptic playbook but turbocharged the pace: We regret to inform you that you will not die from “global warming” because you will all die from COVID…unless you do exactly what we say!
I know, I know…it’s really difficult to accept that “authority” figures really do lie to us all the time. I mean, what kind of people would shamelessly bankrupt small businesses while generating record profits for Amazon and Walmart? How luciferian must our degenerate “ruling class” be if it is willing to arrest Christians for attending church, while encouraging race hucksters to burn down cities in the name of “justice”? How psychopathic must our “leaders” be to bar people from comforting dying loved ones in hospitals or attending their funerals? Unfortunately for us, Marxist-globalists represent the apex class of shameless, luciferian, degenerate, psychopaths.
The one-two punch of the “Global Warming” Hoax and the COVID Hoax seemed to have opened up many eyes in the West. People who aren’t normally inclined to question government authority looked around and wondered, “Could these liars also be lying to us when they say that men have babies and women have penises?”
“Is it possible that taxpayer-funded NGOs launder money into politicians’ pockets?”
“Would the Southern Poverty Law Center really fund the Ku Klux Klan in order to cook up enough fake racism to stay relevant?”
You say enough of these things out loud, and you realize that the whole construct of Marxist-globalism consists of lies, fraud, new forms of control, and new taxes.
People are now waking up to a rather startling set of propositions: Marxist-globalist governments lie to them regularly. Those lies cause harm to citizens. When citizens complain, Marxist-globalist governments tell more lies and try to redirect blame (It’s Trump’s fault; It’s Putin’s fault; It’s that blasted ‘global warming’!). When citizens see through those lies, too, Marxist-globalist governments turn to the same blunt instrument that all totalitarian governments choose: censorship.
It is no coincidence that the United Kingdom (through the Online Safety Act) and the European Union (through the Digital Services Act) are building digital censorship infrastructure meant to keep citizens from talking about certain “taboo” topics (such as mass illegal immigration and the Islamic conquest of their nations) and prevent public debate about anything Marxist-globalist governments do. Canada (through the Online News Act) has made it similarly difficult for citizens to read any information that is contrary to official government propaganda.
Under the guise of “protecting the children,” Australia has implemented age-verification requirements for social media platforms. From its Harmful Digital Communications Act of 2015 to its more recent Safer Online Services project intended to regulate all online content, New Zealand is leading the charge among Western nations (at peace) in implementing total government control over (and censorship of) online speech. Among Western nations at war, Ukraine permits no online dissent to the edicts of its martial-law government.
Strangely, nobody in Europe finds it incongruous that Ukraine’s much-vaunted “defense of democracy” from Russian authoritarianism requires Ukrainian authoritarians to suppress basic democratic principles. Even in the United States — the nation with a First Amendment explicitly protecting free speech from government censorship — Democrats (an inappropriate political party name if ever there was one) are itching to resurrect the Biden administration’s Disinformation Governance Board designed to censor — in the name of “national security” — anything that government bureaucrats deem as “misinformation,” “malinformation,” or “disinformation.”
All across the West, therefore, a similar chain of events is occurring: (1) Marxist-globalists have told so many lies that a critical mass of citizens has begun to notice. (2) As citizens push back against the lies of their Marxist-globalist governments, those governments are becoming increasingly hostile to citizens. (3) In defense of their own authority, Marxist-globalist governments now embrace censorship and the criminalization of private thoughts. (4) Citizens have begun to realize that their own Marxist-globalist governments are the greatest threat to their freedoms, security, and prosperity.
What happens next? Maybe (5): We take the whole Marxist-globalist freak-show down for good. It’s time to end their lies.
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.