One hard-and-fast rule that leftists obey is this: Always accuse political opponents of committing the same transgressions that you are preparing to commit. Accusing innocent people of doing terrible things is dirty politics, but it muddies the waters of public perception just enough to protect the guilty from accountability.
When Democrats commit electoral fraud, they accuse Republicans of trying to steal elections. When leftist revolutionaries burn down cities, ambush and murder law enforcement officers, and demand that state and local governments “defund police,” Democrats accuse grandparents and veterans of being “insurrectionists.” When Bill Clinton gets caught hanging out with Jeffrey Epstein, the Democrat-aligned press accuse Donald Trump of impropriety. When leftist agitators violate federal law by disrupting Christian worship services in Minneapolis, Democrat leader Hakeem Jeffries runs to propaganda network MSNOW to accuse Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents of storming churches.
Republicans, conservatives, and other non-leftists have endured this kind of duplicity for decades. Because the propaganda press work for the Democrat Party, leftist lies are never highlighted. For those who recognize them, however, those lies have become a kind of early-warning system for predicting whatever colossal nonsense Democrats are about to unleash on society. When prominent voices within the Democrat Party all start spouting similar slurs, the rest of us have a pretty good idea how Democrats plan on fomenting chaos and civil unrest.
Clinton family fixer and Democrat liar extraordinaire James Carville recently told MSNOW that President Trump is “going to go to Minneapolis, and he’s going to try to provoke a race war.” That’s about as unhinged and ludicrous a statement that a man not restrained in a loony bin can make, but the “journalists” at MSNOW nodded in agreement and treated it as serious commentary.
Why in the world would Donald Trump want a race war? He’s spent his time in office appealing to larger percentages of black and Hispanic Americans than any Republican since Eisenhower. His entire “America First” agenda is geared toward restoring wealth and stability to Americans of all races who have lost substantial economic ground in the last three decades due to open borders and the offshoring of industrial companies.
Knowing that minorities disproportionately suffer when violent crime rates rise, the president has successfully engineered the greatest drop in homicides since 1900. When the propaganda press can’t cover up this inconvenient fact, Trump’s close relationships with athletes, musicians, and businesspeople of every skin color make it demonstrably clear that the president sees a person’s racial heritage as entirely irrelevant.
Yet Carville insists that President Trump wants to start a “race war” this year. Those of us who understand how serpentine leftists speak recognize Carville’s words as a promise of future violence. When he ridiculously claims that Republicans want a “race war,” he means that Democrats are already manufacturing one right now.
That’s what they want. They want “George Floyd Part II” to turn 2026 into a year of American mayhem, carnage, and rebellion. Just as Democrat-controlled Minnesota sacrificed Minneapolis six years ago as part of a “color revolution” intended to hurt President Trump’s 2020 electoral chances (inconveniently for the propagandists who told Americans that the president was unpopular that year, Trump won twelve million more votes than in his previous election victory over Hillary Clinton), Democrat-controlled Minnesota plans on sacrificing Minneapolis once again in the run-up to the 2026 midterms.
In the name of “stopping Trump,” Democrats will allow Minnesota businesses to burn and the lives of Minnesota law enforcement officers to be endangered.
Unfortunately for law-abiding Americans and police officers, the Democrats’ insurrection strategy appears to be running right on schedule. Ever since an ICE agent defended his life against a woman who used her vehicle as a weapon, officials in Minnesota have spoken of the criminal as if she were a saint. One problem for those Democrats who wished to use the incident to inflame tensions, though, is the fact that the dead aggressor identified as white. Leftists will continue to put the lives of immigration enforcement agents at risk until a rioter who can be described as a “person of color” dies (the lives of black and brown police officers, of course, don’t matter to Democrats).
After federal agents were forced to shoot and kill an armed man who attacked them on Saturday, Minnesota Governor Walz demanded that President Trump remove federal law enforcement from his state. Rather than calling out rioters and provocateurs for threatening the lives of police officers, Walz accused ICE agents of being “violent” and “untrained.” These are lies that leftists will regurgitate across the country. Serial liar and Democrat doofus Keith Olbermann immediately called for Walz to deploy National Guard troops to “defend” Minnesotans from “Trump’s terrorists.”
Rational government officials interested in quelling growing riots would instruct people to leave the area calmly. As Democrats have already planned for a “race war” this year, immoral government officials are falsely blaming federal officials and instructing them to leave. Even before Saturday’s justified shooting, anti-ICE rioters had taken over parts of the Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport the previous evening (when cold weather strikes, provocateurs target warmer venues).
As soon as word got out that federal agents had shot someone on Saturday morning, Minneapolis leftists initiated a long day of throwing rocks, setting fires, and attacking federal agents. One rioter bit off an agent’s finger. Rather than do what he could to protect the lives of police officers and citizens, Minneapolis mayor Jacob Frey sided with the armed man who attacked federal agents: “Six masked agents pummeled our constituents and shot him to death!” Congresswoman Ilhan Omar falsely called it an “execution.”
When Democrats need a “race war,” facts be damned. Carville called for racial violence in Minneapolis; Mayor Frey won’t let Carville down.
Even before Carville told us what was coming, we could all see the signs. Prominent Democrats have been popping up for months to call President Trump and his voters “racists.”
Former first lady Michelle Obama has spent the last year complaining that she has suffered so much from racism in America, even after attending Princeton and Harvard (and acknowledging that she benefited from affirmative action programs unavailable to white Americans) and living in the White House for eight years.
In the same “America is so racist even though I have had more power than 99.99% of white people” vein, former attorney general and Obama “wingman” Eric Holder used a speech meant to honor the memory of Martin Luther King, Jr. to accuse President Trump of implementing “Gestapo tactics” intended to “re-segregate” America.
Standing next to race-hustler Al Sharpton, Holder defended the woman who attacked an ICE agent in Minneapolis and compared the agent’s use of lethal force in defense of his own life to racial violence of the past. Neither Holder nor Sharpton explained how killing a middle-aged white woman who used an automobile to threaten the life of a law enforcement officer had anything to do with Democrats’ Jim Crow laws last century. However, according to the nation’s foremost experts on getting rich by manufacturing false allegations of racism, her death was both “racist” and all President Trump’s fault.
So Minneapolis must burn because the race-hustlers have decided to sacrifice it on the altar of the Democrats’ midterm hopes. Just days ago, James Carville effectively promised that more violence and death were heading to Minnesota when he inexplicably accused President Trump of wanting to watch the North Star State go up in flames. Minnesota Governor Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Frey are busy defending arsonists and wannabe cop killers while condemning those law enforcement officers risking their lives in the state. Democrats have planned a long year of insurrection to distract from their organized fraud and failed policies.
Heed Carville’s promise: The fires and shootings are just beginning.
Comments About This Story Through X:
We are switching to using X as our comment “system.” Our hope is that by using that public forum, more of our readers will be willing to share their thoughts.
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.