(Daily Signal)—Kansas will be the first legal battleground in 2025 to decide whether the national trend of banning foreign money from bankrolling ballot measures is legal—a matter that could be on its way to the Supreme Court.
Democrat election lawyer Marc Elias’ firm is taking the lead in the litigation against the state bans on foreign money promoting state ballot initiatives, starting with Kansas.
The federal lawsuit could affect other states that have passed similar legislation. Just this week, Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee, a Republican, signed the sixth such ban. The previous week, Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte signed a ban, though one that proponents argued was watered down. Earlier this month, the legislatures in Missouri and Texas advanced similar bans.
Washington, D.C.-based Elias Law Group is representing the plaintiffs, Kansans for Constitutional Freedom, which successfully campaigned against an earlier pro-life ballot measure, the Topeka Capital Journal reported. The Kansas-based firm of Irigonegaray and Revenaugh is also representing the plaintiffs.
The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Ohio’s first-in-the-nation ban in a ruling last fall. However, Elias and other opponents of the bans are likely seeking split decisions among circuit courts to force the matter to the U.S. Supreme Court to make an ultimate judgment, said Jason Snead, executive director of the Honest Elections Project.
“I would like to think there is a clear judicial precedent, but Marc Elias is good at judge-shopping and is looking for a circuit split,” Snead told The Daily Signal. Judge-shopping is a practice where plaintiffs look for particular judges who may be more sympathetic to their cases. “So, there is a very good chance this will wind up before the Supreme Court. But my preference is that every judge will look at the legal merits.”
Snead expects that by the end of all the state legislative sessions, at least eight bans on foreign funding for ballot measures will be enacted.
Last month, Arkansas Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed a ban, so did Kentucky Democrat Gov. Andy Beshear and Indiana Republican Gov. Mike Braun. In 2024, Ohio became the first state to enact a ban.
The Kansas Legislature passed the ban by a broad bipartisan vote, and Democrat Gov. Laura Kelly let it become law without her signature, despite opposition.
The plaintiffs argue the Kansas law infringes on free speech rights and could affect legal residents.
The law not only prohibits contributions directly from foreign entities for ballot measures but also contributions from U.S. individuals and organizations that received more than $100,000 from foreign nationals in the past four years, which the lawsuit contends is burdensome.
Foreign contributions to political candidates are already illegal, but the Federal Election Commission declined to rule on a 2023 complaint about foreign funding for a Montana ballot measure. The FEC contended that under existing law, it had no power to police foreign donations for ballot initiatives, only donations to candidates. The FEC recommended Congress address the issue.
The Elias Law Group did not respond to an inquiry for this story.
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.