(DCNF)—Lawmakers have introduced several pieces of legislation to restrict Artificial Intelligence (AI) data centers as more Americans have voiced their opposition to the construction projects in their communities, but many of the bills have continued to languish in Congress.
Some members of Congress have sought to channel the anti-data center sentiment sweeping across local communities by introducing legislation to resist more construction projects. These pieces of legislation have not advanced beyond the introduction stage, largely because Republicans are split on the issue and have been unable to advance bills from the markup stage, particularly as tech giants like Google and Meta have lobbied heavily against moratoriums, off-grid mandates and other measures.
Meta launched a pro-AI super PAC effort that was expected to spend around $65 million for the midterms, according to Axios. Another PAC called Leading the Future raised $50 million. Meta also gave $45 million to a federally registered nonprofit, American Technology Excellence Project, to back candidates who “advocate for AI progress,” according to The Washington Post. Google has contributed millions to midterm candidates, including a $5 million donation to the California Leads committee, which supports pro-AI candidates, the Post reported.
Republican House Energy and Commerce Chairman Brett Guthrie of Kentucky said he was unsure that federal legislation was necessary, according to E & E. Republican Ohio Rep. Bob Latta, chairman of the Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Energy, said his panel had no plans regarding data centers.
The House Judiciary Committee failed to pass the “Protect American AI Act,” which would limit litigation against data centers’ environmental reviews. Republican Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie said he planned to vote against the bill “because no industry deserves special treatment under the law.” The bill was pulled from consideration in the committee.
A pro-AI political operation called Innovation Council Action planned to spend $100 million on the 2026 midterm elections, according to Axios. The group is led by Taylor Budowich, a former Trump White House deputy chief of staff who previously led the pro-Trump MAGA Inc. super PAC and Securing American Greatness political operations.
Republican Pennsylvania Rep. Rob Bresnahan introduced legislation called “The Local Control Protection Act,” which would restrict companies’ abilities to sue municipalities for rejecting applications to build data centers.
“We should never let billion-dollar corporations supersede the voices of those who live in the community,” Bresnahan said, according to Axios. “The people who live here, work here, and raise their families here are the ones who know what’s best for our communities.”
Bresnahan is up for reelection in November and will face Democratic Scranton Mayor Paige Cognetti.
Republican Tennessee Rep. Matt Van Epps introduced The Critical Infrastructure Airspace Defense Act Thursday, which could arm companies that own data centers. The proposed legislation was in response to key investors warning about domestic terrorism targeting AI data centers, while critics point out that data centers may be doing more harm than good.
The bill would allow the private ownership of anti-drone technologies, including directed-energy systems, projectile-based systems (guns) and net-capture systems, among other weapons platforms.
In March 2025, independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders introduced legislation to place a moratorium on new AI data center construction until safeguards addressed AI risks, energy use and public impacts. Democratic New Jersey Rep. LaMonica McIver also introduced the AI Data Center Site Selection Transparency Act of 2026 in April, which would require developers to disclose proposed AI data sites at least 180 days in advance to prevent “surprise” developments.
President Donald Trump introduced Project Stargate, a $500 billion AI infrastructure network soon after he returned to the White House in January 2025. The venture was backed by Big Tech CEOs and major tech giants, including OpenAI. Trump signed an executive order on June 2 that asked tech companies to voluntarily give the government oversight of new AI models before releasing them to the public, though Big Tech reportedly pressured it to be delayed and watered down.
Lawmakers also introduced legislation to ensure these data centers use off-grid power sources. Republican Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley and Democratic Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal introduced the Guaranteeing Rate Insulation from Data Centers (GRID) Act, which requires new data centers to use off-grid power sources and mandates existing ones to transition within ten years.
This legislation would guarantee no increase in consumer utility prices, ensure new data centers use energy from power generation sources that are separate from the grid, with a ten-year off-ramp for existing data centers to find an alternative power source, according to Blumenthal’s press release. It would also establish new transparency measures so that data center operators publicly disclosed their current and future utility usage and other related information.
Mid-sized data centers can consume as much water as a small town, according to the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Larger facilities may require up to 5 million gallons of water per day.
In January, Democratic Florida Reps. Mike Levin and Kathy Castor put forth the Stopping Hikes In Electricity from Large Load Demands (SHIELD) Act, which would ensure that massive electricity users bear the costs of grid infrastructure they require, while incentivizing large energy consumption facilities to power their operations with zero-emission electricity.
“Families should not be forced to subsidize massive energy costs for billion-dollar companies” Levin said. “As we advance the future of artificial intelligence and data centers , we need to ensure that there are clear rules that protect consumers from higher bills and protect our climate from higher emissions. The SHIELD Act makes sure large energy users pay their fair share for grid upgrades and incentivizes them to power their operations with clean, zero-emission electricity, without leaving consumers footing the bill.”
Trump signed the Ratepayer Protection Pledge in March to ensure the construction of data centers does not raise residents’ electricity costs.
Democratic Ohio Rep. Greg Landsman also introduced the Protecting Families from AI Data Center Energy Costs Act in December 2025 to protect residential and small commercial customers from AI data center-related cost increases. Democratic New Jersey Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman introduced a bill in March that would authorize a Department of Energy study on the environmental, economic and public health impacts of data centers.
Many Americans have cited concerns about AI data centers and voted to restrict them in their communities.
A Financial Times survey from June 4 found that 26% of Americans supported increased construction of data centers, which is the lowest in comparison to other major countries like Germany and Great Britain. More than 350,000 people signed a petition opposing a proposed data center bordering the Nashville Zoo in Tennessee, Axios reported. Residents in Seattle, Washington, move to ban new large data centers for a year.
Monterey Park, California, residents voted in favor of a permanent ban on data centers, marking the first such ban nationwide, SF Gate reported. Voters in Festus, Missouri, also ousted four members of their city council in April who supported a $6 billion data center project, while voters in Port Washington, Wisconsin, backed a measure to crack down on data centers.
Speaker Mike Johnson backed a bipartisan deliberation draft put forth by Republican California Rep. Jay Obernolte and Democratic Massachusetts Rep. Lori Trahan called the Great American AI Act, which would regulate AI by establishing transparency and auditing requirements and mandating improved federal data collection on AI’s labor market impacts.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
- Hand-curated links from conservative and Christian sites — NO legacy media garbage links. Patriots get their news every day at JDRucker.com
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.