(DCNF)—Avowed socialist Zohran Mamdani says his mayoral campaign has put progressives in the driver’s seat of the Democratic Party — but establishment Democrats are not ready to take their hands off the wheel.
Mamdani, 33, the party’s nominee in the New York City mayoral race, declared Monday that his proudly socialist campaign “won the battle over the soul of the Democratic Party” before a rally of 3,000 supporters on Monday evening. The Daily Caller News Foundation asked 11 Senate Democrats about Mamdani’s remarks and they all either sought to distance themselves from the socialist candidate or declined to comment on his place within the party.
“I tend to focus on Michigan and not on Manhattan politics,” Michigan Sen. Elissa Slotkin, a rising star among Democrats, told the DCNF when asked if she agreed that Mamdani’s campaign won the “soul” of the party.
“I just think New York politics are different from Kansas politics, which are different than Michigan politics,” Slotkin added.
“It’s [New York City] not the rest of the country,” Slotkin’s retiring Michigan colleague, Democratic Sen. Gary Peters, told the DCNF.
National Democrats have been cautious about embracing Mamdani following his shock victory over former Democratic New York Governor Andrew Cuomo in the June primary contest. More Democrats have rolled out endorsements in recent weeks as the election enters its final stretch and Mamdani’s commanding lead in polling appears insurmountable for the other candidates in the race.
However, many Democratic lawmakers insist any consequences of Mamdani’s rapid rise for the party should be limited to the city’s five boroughs — and are seeking to hold him at arm’s length.
“I’m one of those persons that said we should bring him into the fold and all this kind of stuff,” Arizona Sen. Ruben Gallego, a Democrat with rumored presidential ambitions, told the DCNF. “Mamdani represents the New York Democratic Party and their establishment, and there’s nothing wrong with that, but it doesn’t mean that his brand would carry somewhere else.”
“You talked to my colleagues from New York? I mean I don’t vote for that guy,” Democratic New Mexico Sen. Ben Ray Lújan told the DCNF.
New York’s two senators, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, the leader of Senate Democrats’ campaign arm, have notably sat on the sidelines of the mayoral contest.
Some national Democrats appear uncomfortable with some of Mamdani’s far-left views and are wary of the socialist candidate damaging the party’s already poor brand, which has plummeted to its lowest point in decades.
Top Republicans, including President Donald Trump, have argued that Mamdani’s socialist politics will be a useful foil for the party’s efforts to win the midterms next year.
Mamdani once called for defunding the police, who he claimed was “racist, anti-queer & a major threat to public safety” during the heyday of the Black Lives Matter protests.
Among the far-left policies on his campaign platform, he wants to freeze the rent and eliminate a gifted program in schools that allows high-achieving children to learn beyond their grade level.
Mamdani also did not condemn the phrase “globalize the intifada,” language many view as a call to violence against Jews and the state of Israel, until after becoming the Democratic nominee for mayor. The socialist candidate has not backtracked from his vow to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu if he steps foot in Manhattan during his mayoral tenure.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries has repeatedly dodged questions about why he is dragging his feet on endorsing Mamdani.
Jeffries sidestepped a question from CNN’s Dana Bash on Tuesday probing whether he thought Mamdani and his movement represents the soul of the party.
“Well the Democratic Party, of course, is extremely diverse, and it’s represented by people like Mikie Sherrill—,” Jeffries said referring to an establishment Democrat who is the party’s nominee in the New Jersey gubernatorial race.
“But there’s only one soul,” Bash interjected.
Jeffries continued the interview without directly commenting on the socialist’s place within the party. The minority leader said he would meet with Mamdani again before early voting begins later in October.
Other Democrats gave polite responses to Mamdani’s remarks without sharing their opinion.
“The Democratic Party has a range of views, just like the Republican Party has a range of views,” Democratic Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly, another potential 2028 presidential contender, told the DCNF.
Democratic Delaware Sen. Lisa Blunt Rochester did not comment on the statement, telling the DCNF she had not seen Mamdani’s comments. However, she added that she sees “some positive energy from New York.”
Democratic Sens. Chris Murphy of Connecticut and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts also declined to comment, claiming they had not seen Mamdani’s remarks.
Warren, a leader of the party’s left flank, was among a handful of congressional Democrats who endorsed Mamdani after his primary win. She campaigned for him in August, praising his campaign’s focus on cost-of-living issues.
Despite many national Democrats’ apparent reticence to embrace Mamdani’s rise, his supporters argue the socialist candidate is carving a path for Democrats to win back power.
“The Democratic Party has got to shed the influence of the billionaire class and corporations on it, and has got to speak to the needs of the working class,” Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, who endorsed Mamdani ahead of the Democratic mayoral primary, told the DCNF. “And certainly, when Mamdani talks about affordability, he’s speaking the right language.”
A spokesperson for Mamdani did not immediately respond to the DCNF’s request for comment.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.