(Daily Signal)—President Donald Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and other European leaders agree: Ukraine must have security protections in any Ukraine-Russia peace deal.
During the White House meeting Monday between Trump, Zelenskyy, and seven European leaders, discussion of security guarantees for Ukraine took center stage.
Russian President Vladimir Putin “agreed that Russia would accept security guarantees for Ukraine, and this is one of the key points that we need to consider, and we are going to be considering that at the table,” Trump said at the meeting Monday.
Neither Trump nor the European leaders have explained what those security guarantees might include, but K.T. McFarland, former U.S. deputy national security adviser to Trump, said we do know what they won’t entail.
Trump has made it clear that “NATO membership is just off the table for a bunch of reasons,” McFarland told The Daily Signal, adding that “U.S. boots on the ground is probably off the table,” as well.
National security and foreign policy experts think security protections for Ukraine could, or should, include something similar to NATO’s Article 5 protections, European troops stationed in Ukraine indefinitely, border security, or increased weaponry and military assets in Ukraine. Experts stress security protections for Ukraine must work to deter and discourage future Russian aggression.
Article 5
U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff said NATO Article 5-type security protections for Ukraine are on the table.
Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty states that an attack against one NATO member nation “shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them” will assist the other nation attacked as each member country “deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.”
Victoria Coates, former deputy national security adviser to Trump, says Article 5-type protection for Ukraine could include language stating “any attack on Ukraine may trigger a U.S. military response,” but would likely not guarantee such a response.
European Troops
Because Trump has ruled out U.S. troops on the ground in Ukraine, Europe might send troops, likely primarily from France and Britain, according to Nile Gardiner, a Heritage Foundation expert on Europe who formerly served as a foreign policy researcher and aide to then-British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.
The exact number of troops France or Britain might send is unclear, Gardiner said, but he estimates it might be around 10,000 total. In that case, the “U.S. role would be basically to provide support for European forces on the ground,” he told The Daily Signal.
“Support” could include air support and intelligence or logistics support to Ukrainian and European troops on the ground, according to Gardiner.
McFarland agrees that security protections for Ukraine might involve European troops on the ground, adding that the U.S. might then backfill military responsibility those troops had filled within NATO.
Border Security
A security guarantee for Ukraine should include “a secure eastern border with Russia,” Coates, who also serves as vice president of the Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy at The Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Signal.
“I would like to see NATO countries that border Russia go into a collective border security arrangement” to protect Ukraine, Coates said. Security protections for Ukraine are “meaningless if Putin still has a straight shot into Ukraine,” she added.
Belarus, Latvia, Estonia and Finland border Russia north of Ukraine. These nations could “coordinate with Ukraine, share technology, [and] share equipment,” Coates said.
A security barrier could include various technologies, sensors, physical troops, and even a physical wall, according to Coates.
Weapons
In July, Trump announced the U.S. would sell weapons to NATO, which would in turn provide Ukraine with the weaponry. There is a need for more weapons and defense systems in Ukraine to ensure a peace deal does not lead to another invasion of Ukraine, according to Kateryna Lisunova, media adviser for the pro-Ukraine advocacy group Razom for Ukraine.
In a “perfect reality,” Lisunova said, security protections for Ukraine would include the nuclear weapons and bombers Ukraine gave up in the Budapest Memorandum. Ukraine had a large nuclear arsenal following the collapse of the Soviet Union, but in 1994, Ukraine, Russia, the U.S., and the United Kingdom signed the agreement for Ukraine to give up the weapons.
Lisunova acknowledges Ukraine being made a nuclear power again is not an option on the table. Instead, security protections for Ukraine should include an air-defense system, fighter jets, long-range missiles, and no restrictions on the use of those weapons, Lisunova told The Daily Signal.
Timeline
The details of what security protections mean for Ukraine are expected to be made clear following a meeting between Putin and Zelenskyy, which the White House says will take place in the coming weeks, and a subsequent trilateral meeting among Trump, Putin, and Zelenskyy.
“I called President Putin, and we’re trying to work out a meeting with President Zelenskyy,” Trump told Fox News on Tuesday morning.
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.