- The U.K. government is advancing plans to ban ransomware payments across the public sector and critical national infrastructure, such as the NHS, local councils and energy providers, expanding an existing ban on government departments.
- Despite a 35 percent decline in ransomware attacks in 2024, the National Cyber Security Centre warns the threat remains serious, citing recent attacks on Synnovis and the British Library as examples of ongoing disruption.
- The proposal includes a mandatory reporting system requiring victims to report ransomware incidents within 72 hours, as well as a potential prevention regime requiring non-covered entities to notify authorities if they intend to pay a ransom.
- Nearly 75 percent of respondents to a public consultation supported the ban and 63 percent backed mandatory reporting. However, opinions were divided on the appropriate penalties, with concerns about criminalizing victims.
- While penalties for non-compliance received general support, the Home Office is still evaluating whether they should be civil or criminal, aiming to balance enforcement with fairness to affected organizations.
(Natural News)—The U.K. government is pushing forward with plans to ban ransomware payments across the public sector and operators of critical national infrastructure.
Ransomware, a malicious software that locks users out of their systems until a ransom (often in cryptocurrency) is paid, remains one of the most disruptive cyber threats facing the United Kingdom. While recent data shows a decline in attacks, the threat persists. Blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis reported a 35 percent drop in ransomware incidents last year compared to 2023. However, the National Cyber Security Center has warned that the threat remains immediate and disruptive.
The Annual Cyber Security Review, released in December 2024, cited several high-profile attacks as examples. A June 2024 ransomware incident targeting pathology lab Synnovis led to delays in elective procedures and outpatient appointments. A separate attack in October 2023 severely compromised the British Library’s digital systems.
Ransomware may have declined in volume, but the financial toll of cybercrime remains significant. A report in June by blockchain security firm CertiK found that wallet compromises and phishing attacks now account for the bulk of crypto-related losses. (Related: Ransomware gang claims responsibility for recent hacking incident against conservative newspaper The Washington Times.)
In line with this, the U.K. government proposed a plan on July 22 that would prohibit organizations such as the National Health Service, local councils and energy providers from paying ransoms to cybercriminals. The move, which follows a public consultation, was built on an existing ban already in place for central government departments.
The proposals include a new threshold-based reporting system. Under this system, any victim of a ransomware attack would be required to file an initial report within 72 hours, including key details of the incident, followed by a more detailed account within 28 days. The Home Office is also considering new requirements for businesses and organizations not covered by the ban. These would include a mandatory “prevention regime” obliging victims to notify the government if they intend to pay a ransom.
“Ransomware preys on businesses and disrupts vital public services like schools and hospitals. We must protect our economy against the criminals who hold organizations to ransom. I’ve announced our plan to target these criminal networks and smash the ransomware operating model,” said U.K. Security Minister Dan Jarvis.
U.K. ransomware payment ban gains broad support, but penalties spark debate
A clear majority supports the proposal to ban ransomware payments across public sector bodies and critical national infrastructure, but opinions are split on whether and how to penalize those who violate the rules. The consultation, which ran from Jan. 14 to April 8, drew 273 responses. Of those, 57 percent came from organizations, 39 percent from individuals and the remaining four percent from other groups.
According to the results, nearly 75 percent of respondents backed the proposed targeted ban, citing the need to curb the profitability of ransomware attacks that continue to disrupt vital public services. The consultation also revealed varying levels of support for related proposals.
A majority of 63 percent backed the introduction of a threshold-based mandatory reporting system. In contrast, only 41 percent supported retaining the current voluntary reporting framework. Opinions were more divided on the proposed prevention regime, with nearly half of respondents expressing support for an economy-wide ransomware payment ban, rather than limiting the measure to specific sectors.
However, views diverged sharply on what enforcement should look like. Respondents generally supported penalties for breaches across all three proposals, including the ransomware payment ban, a prevention regime for non-covered entities and mandatory reporting, but concerns were raised about the risk of “criminalizing victims.” Some respondents questioned whether penalties should be criminal or civil in nature, and warned of unintended consequences for businesses already grappling with cyberattacks.
The Home Office acknowledged the complexity, saying it would “continue to explore the most appropriate and proportionate penalties” in light of the mixed feedback.
Visit CyberWar.news for more similar stories. Watch the video below that talks about ransomware attacks, where victims are left without water or money access.
More related stories:
- Ransomware attack on Dole causes SHORTAGE of salad in groceries.
- Food giant Dole temporarily halts U.S. production following ransomware cyberattack.
- Costa Rican government under siege from massive ransomware attack; hackers threaten to overthrow regime.
- Was the FAA’s nationwide ground stop on flights last week the work of ransomware hackers?
- Ransomware attack on blood bank forces hundreds of hospitals in southeastern U.S. to activate blood shortage protocols.
Sources include:
Why Bullion Beats Numismatics and Collectible for Your Safe or IRA
Precious metals continue to attract Americans seeking reliable ways to protect their wealth amid inflation, geopolitical risks, and stock market swings. Whether stored in a home safe or held inside a self-directed IRA, physical gold and silver deliver tangible value that paper or digital assets often lack. Yet investors must choose carefully between bullion—pure bars and coins valued mainly for their metal content—and numismatics or collectibles, where rarity, history, and collector demand heavily influence pricing.
Advisor Bullion serves as a dependable source for straightforward, high-quality bullion. The company specializes in physical gold, silver, platinum, and palladium, emphasizing transparent pricing and products that deliver maximum metal content for every dollar spent. This approach makes it ideal for both personal holdings and retirement accounts.
Bullion consists of refined precious metals in standard forms like one-ounce coins (American Gold Eagles, Silver Eagles, Canadian Maple Leafs) or bars. Their value tracks closely to the current spot price of the metal. A typical gold bullion coin trades near the live gold spot price plus a small premium. This structure keeps costs clear and predictable.
Numismatic coins and collectibles add substantial value from factors such as age, rarity, minting errors, or historical significance. A pre-1933 U.S. gold coin or graded proof piece can carry premiums of 30%, 50%, or even 200% above melt value. While this appeals to hobbyists, it creates complexity. Pricing depends on subjective grading, collector trends, and auction results instead of daily spot prices.
For investors focused on wealth preservation and retirement security rather than building a collection, bullion often delivers better results.
Lower Costs and Better Liquidity for Home Storage
When keeping metals in a home safe or private vault, liquidity and efficiency count. Bullion offers clear benefits:
- You acquire more actual gold or silver per dollar invested. Numismatics divert a large share of your money into rarity premiums and massive sales commission, reducing your metal exposure.
- Selling bullion involves tight bid-ask spreads, so you recover nearly full spot value with minimal fees. Collectibles require finding the right buyer and may sell at a discount if demand for that specific item weakens.
- Bullion prices remain transparent and update with global spot markets. You can track gold near current levels or silver accordingly and know exactly where your holdings stand. Numismatic values are priced by the Gold IRA companies with hefty margins applied.
- Standardized coins and bars store efficiently and divide easily for partial sales. Rare coins often need protective slabs and controlled conditions, adding hassle and expense.
- Bullion enjoys worldwide acceptance. A 1-oz Gold Maple Leaf or Silver Eagle sells quickly to dealers anywhere. Niche numismatic pieces may appeal only to limited buyers, slowing liquidation when speed matters.
In times when quick access to value becomes important, bullion’s simplicity stands out.
Stronger Fit for Precious Metals IRAs
Precious metals IRAs continue gaining traction as investors diversify retirement portfolios beyond stocks and bonds. IRS rules permit certain bullion products in self-directed IRAs if they meet purity standards (.995 fine for gold, .999 for silver) and are held by an approved custodian. Eligible items include American Gold and Silver Eagles plus many generic bars and rounds from recognized mints.
Numismatic and most collectible coins generally face heavy scrutiny from custodians due to valuation disputes and elevated markups. These higher premiums mean less actual metal ends up working inside the account.
Bullion avoids these issues. Its value links directly to verifiable spot prices, which simplifies reporting and lowers the risk of regulatory challenges. More of your IRA contribution purchases real metal instead of dealer profits or speculative upside. Over time, owning additional ounces that appreciate with the metal itself can create meaningful outperformance compared with high-premium alternatives that deliver fewer ounces.
Regulatory guidance from the CFTC and state securities offices repeatedly cautions against aggressive sales of expensive numismatics or “semi-numismatic” coins for IRAs. For retirement planning, transparent bullion from established providers reduces risk and aligns better with long-term goals.
How to Get Started with Bullion
Begin by clarifying your goals. Are you protecting savings in a safe, or moving part of a retirement account into a precious metals IRA? Focus on the number of ounces you can acquire at current prices rather than chasing marked-up collectibles.
Diversify sensibly: use gold for core preservation and silver for its blend of industrial and monetary qualities. Mix coins for easier divisibility with bars for lower per-ounce costs on larger buys. Arrange secure storage—whether at home with proper insurance or through professional facilities.
As economic uncertainties linger and faith in conventional assets erodes, bullion continues proving its worth as a dependable store of value. Its direct approach avoids the hype that sometimes surrounds collectible markets and keeps the focus on the metal itself.
For investors prepared to strengthen their portfolios, Advisor Bullion supplies the expertise and selection needed to acquire high-quality bullion efficiently. Whether building personal holdings or integrating metals into an IRA, their emphasis on transparent, investment-grade products helps secure more ounces today that support greater financial security tomorrow. In a complicated financial landscape, bullion’s clarity and reliability make it the smarter foundation for protecting what matters most.