(The Epoch Times)—Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel announced on June 18 that they had finalized their nearly $15 billion acquisition deal. As a result, shares of the U.S. steel giant stopped trading on the New York Stock Exchange.
A notice confirmed that the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) informed the Securities and Exchange Commission that the U.S. steelmaker’s shares would be delisted following the completion of Nippon Steel’s acquisition.
The stock, which debuted on the NYSE in 1901, ceased trading at 8:25 a.m. ET on June 18.
In a joint statement, the companies announced that Nippon Steel closed its $14.9 billion acquisition of the struggling U.S. steelmaker.
Following through on its initial bid in 2023, Nippon acquired 100 percent of U.S. Steel’s shares at $55 per share.
Nippon and U.S. Steel leaders thanked President Donald Trump for his participation in the deal.
“Thanks to President Trump’s bold leadership, American workers secured the best possible deal. U.S. Steel will remain rooted in the United States and continue to call Pittsburgh home,” U.S. Steel CEO Dave Burritt said in a statement.
“Through our partnership with Nippon Steel, we are poised to grow better and bigger, with transformative investment, cutting-edge technology, and the creation of good-paying jobs across the United States.”
Nippon’s crude steel output capacity is projected to increase to 86 million tons annually, inching closer to the company’s 100-million-ton goal, according to the news release.
The deal has been a political hot potato for the past two years.
Trump initially opposed the Japanese company’s bid during the 2024 election campaign.
“We saved the steel industry. Now, U.S. Steel is being bought by Japan. So terrible,” he said after a Jan. 31 meeting with the president of the Teamsters labor union in the nation’s capital.
However, the president changed his position upon returning to the White House. In April, Trump authorized a 45-day review of the agreement, reversing his predecessor’s decision to block Nippon’s purchase over national security concerns.
Shortly after the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States completed its review and the companies received regulatory approvals, Trump signed an executive order setting up Nippon’s investment in U.S. Steel.
As a condition of support, Trump required the two companies to sign a national security agreement. The U.S. government would possess a “golden share,” which grants the president veto power over several corporate decisions, such as relocating jobs or production outside the United States, changing the name, and moving U.S. Steel’s headquarters from Pittsburgh.
The “partnership”—as the steelmakers and Trump have described the deal—would see U.S. Steel receive $11 billion in investment over the next three years. This includes $1 billion for a new domestic mill, which is expected to increase by $3 billion in subsequent years.
Japanese investors have been placing significant bets on the U.S. economy under Trump’s leadership.
Japanese tycoon Masayoshi Son, the founder and CEO of SoftBank Group, announced in December a $100 billion investment in the United States over the next four years.
“My confidence level in the economy of the United States has tremendously increased with his victory,” Son said at a news conference at the time. “President Trump is a double-down president. I’m going to have to double down.”
Son will also head the Stargate Project, a four-year, $500 billion investment in constructing new artificial intelligence infrastructure in the United States.
The Steel Deal
In March, Trump imposed 25 percent tariffs on steel imports. These levies were increased to 50 percent for most countries exporting steel to the United States.
Trump justified the tariffs, relying on Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, by arguing that foreign subsidies and dumping practices harmed domestic producers and weakened the U.S. industrial base.
The industry lauded the president’s tariff increase, stating that global overcapacity and production are growing while worldwide demand has been flat.
“Given these challenging international conditions that show no signs of improvement, this tariff action will help prevent new surges in imports that would injure American steel producers and their workers,” Kevin Dempsey, the president and CEO of the American Iron and Steel Institute, said in a statement to The Epoch Times.
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.